Composite Sliding Block for Frictional Seismic Isolators

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing friction-type seismic isolators lack mechanisms to protect their integrity from lateral impacts and vertical lifting, which can cause significant inelastic deformations and potential collapse, especially due to foundation failure or isolator lifting during earthquakes.

Innovation Solution

A composite sliding block is introduced for friction-type seismic isolators, incorporating energy dissipation elements and axially flexible components to mitigate horizontal and vertical impacts. The sliding block features a high-friction interface and an elastomeric seal to absorb and dissipate impact energy, while elastomeric compression supports help absorb vertical loads.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional friction-type seismic isolators are used, then they allow energy dissipation through friction, but they lack protection mechanisms against lateral impacts and vertical lifting causing inelastic deformations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintegrity of seismic isolatorVSAvoidstructure of sliding block
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sliding block is divided into multiple components: a first contact component, a second contact component, and an energy dissipation element positioned between them. This segmentation allows each component to perform specific functions - the contact components interface with support plates while the energy dissipation element protects against impacts, thereby improving reliability without requiring a completely new device design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The energy dissipation element is nested between the two contact components within the sliding block structure. This nested arrangement allows the protective mechanism to be integrated into the existing sliding block without significantly increasing overall device complexity, as the energy dissipation element is contained within the space already defined by the contact components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Reliability

If simple sliding blocks are used, then manufacturing is easier and cost is lower, but they cannot dissipate impact energy and protect against lateral impacts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection against lateral impactVSAvoidmanufacturing of sliding block
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The energy dissipation element changes the mechanical parameters of the sliding block by introducing controlled flexibility and energy absorption capacity. This element can be designed with specific material properties and geometric parameters to dissipate impact energy, allowing the block to protect against lateral impacts while maintaining manufacturability through standardized component design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If rigid sliding blocks are used, then they provide stable support, but they concentrate stresses and cause metal-to-metal contact during vertical impact

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresilience to vertical impactVSAvoidstress concentration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The energy dissipation element acts as a flexible component between the rigid contact components, preventing direct metal-to-metal contact during vertical impact. This flexible element distributes and absorbs impact stresses, reducing stress concentrations while maintaining the stable support function of the rigid contact components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The energy dissipation element is pre-positioned between the contact components to provide cushioning before vertical impact occurs. This beforehand cushioning mechanism ensures that when vertical impact happens, the flexible element is already in place to absorb the shock and prevent direct contact between metal surfaces, thereby reducing stress concentrations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The composite sliding block enhances the resilience of seismic isolators to both horizontal and vertical impacts, reducing stress concentrations and preventing metal-to-metal contact, thereby improving structural integrity and performance during extreme earthquakes.

Implementation Method 1

an elastomeric seal arranged between the first contact component and the second contact component... capable of laterally being compressed by the effect of a relative displacement between the two contact components

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

the elastomeric seal... dissipates energy

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDamping: Damping

Implementation Method 3

Two types of forces are generated on each sliding surface: (i) forces perpendicular to such surfaces, generically referred to as normal reactions; and (ii) friction forces parallel to such surfaces

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 4

elastomeric compression supports arranged respectively between each low-friction sliding plate and a bottom of a corresponding niche in a confined manner... to absorb vertical loads

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Data Source

PatentUS12320146B2Composite sliding block for frictional-type seismic isolators and seismic isolators with said composite sliding block
Publication Date: 2025.06.03 PONTIFISIA UNIVERSIDAD KATOLIKA DE CHILE
  • US12320146B2 patent drawing
  • US12320146B2 patent drawing
  • US12320146B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A composite sliding block to be arranged between two supporting plates of a frictional-type seismic isolator, with one supporting plate connected to the superstructure to be isolated and the other to the foundations, comprising two contact components that externally are slidingly or articulatedly in contact with said supporting plates, depending on whether the isolator has one or two sliding surfaces, and internally are coupled to each other by means of a male projection of one component in a female recess of the other. An elastomeric seal occupies an empty space surrounding the projection within the recess and, on the external side of the contact component(s) slidingly in contact with the supporting plate(s), a sliding plate is accommodated in a corresponding niche having an elastomeric compression support at the bottom. Frictional pendulum-type isolators with one or two concave sliding surfaces include such a block.