Composite SOFC Electrolyte Strength and Cost Trade-off

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

High-temperature solid oxide fuel cell systems face challenges in achieving a balance between electrolyte strength, cost, and conductivity, with existing materials often requiring thicker electrolytes and higher production costs, while also experiencing degradation over time.

Innovation Solution

A composite electrolyte material comprising a mixture of yttria stabilized zirconia and scandia stabilized zirconia, with a specific weight ratio, is used to enhance flexural strength, maintain reasonable conductivity, and match the coefficient of thermal expansion with chromium-iron alloy interconnects, allowing for thinner electrolytes and reduced production costs without significant performance impact.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If traditional electrolyte materials are used, then electrolyte strength is improved, but production cost increases and electrolyte thickness must be increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrolyte strengthVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a composite electrolyte material comprising a first portion of scandia stabilized zirconia and a second portion of yttria stabilized zirconia. This composite structure allows the electrolyte to achieve the necessary mechanical strength while using thinner sections, thereby reducing production costs without compromising performance. The combination of different zirconia stabilizers optimizes both structural integrity and ionic conductivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Ease of manufacture

If electrolyte thickness is reduced, then production cost decreases, but electrolyte strength and conductivity are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction costVSAvoidelectrolyte performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating distinct portions within the electrolyte with different compositions optimized for their specific functions. The first portion (scandia stabilized zirconia) and second portion (yttria stabilized zirconia) are distributed in specific ratios to achieve optimal local properties throughout the electrolyte structure, ensuring both mechanical strength and ionic conductivity are maintained even at reduced thickness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

By using a composite of scandia stabilized zirconia and yttria stabilized zirconia in specific weight ratios (1:4 to 4:1), the electrolyte achieves enhanced mechanical properties and maintained ionic conductivity at thinner sections, resolving the contradiction between reduced thickness and preserved performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Reliability

If scandia stabilized zirconia is used to improve conductivity, then electrolyte performance is enhanced, but production cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrolyte conductivityVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the weight ratio of scandia stabilized zirconia to yttria stabilized zirconia within the range of 1:4 to 4:1. By adjusting this parameter, the electrolyte achieves the necessary ionic conductivity while controlling the amount of expensive scandia material used, thereby balancing performance enhancement with cost effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The composite structure allows partial substitution of expensive scandia stabilized zirconia with more economical yttria stabilized zirconia while maintaining adequate conductivity through the synergistic effect of both materials in the specified ratio range.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The composite electrolyte material enables long-term operation with low degradation, reduced production costs, and improved electrolyte performance, supporting the development of more efficient and cost-effective solid oxide fuel cell systems.

Implementation Method 1

The fuel cell, operating at a typical temperature between 750° C. and 950° C., enables the transport of negatively charged oxygen ions from the cathode flow stream to the anode flow stream

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIonic conduction: Conduction (electrical)

Implementation Method 2

match the coefficient of thermal expansion with chromium-iron alloy interconnects

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal expansion: Thermal Expansion

Data Source

PatentUS10593981B2Heterogeneous ceramic composite SOFC electrolyte
Publication Date: 2020.03.17 BLOOM ENERGY CORP
  • US10593981B2 patent drawing
  • US10593981B2 patent drawing
  • US10593981B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) includes a cathode electrode, a solid oxide electrolyte, and an anode electrode. The electrolyte includes yttria stabilized zirconia and scandia stabilized zirconia, such as scandia ceria stabilized zirconia.