Composite table top

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional wood table tops are not environmentally friendly, require constant maintenance, and may not be suitable for all applications, while synthetic materials like fiberboard or flake board have similar drawbacks, and blow molding results in heavy, over-materialized table tops that are not durable or lightweight.

Innovation Solution

A composite table top design featuring a top plate with an outer and inner surface, a bottom plate with projections, and reinforcement inserts at the edges, manufactured through vacuum forming, where the sum of the top surfaces of the projections is 30%-70% of the upper surface, providing improved mechanical properties and reduced material usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If blow molding is used to manufacture synthetic table top, then the table top can be made of synthetic material, but the table top becomes heavy and uses excessive material

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesynthetic material applicabilityVSAvoidtable top weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The table top is divided into multiple components: a lightweight base structure made of synthetic material, and separate reinforcement elements (metal or wood strips) that are attached to the base. This segmentation allows the main body to use lightweight synthetic material while adding minimal weight through strategic placement of reinforcement elements only where structurally necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Reinforcement elements are applied locally at specific high-stress areas such as edges, corners, and leg attachment points rather than uniformly across the entire table top. This local quality approach provides necessary structural strength at critical locations while minimizing overall material usage and weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If sufficient thickness is provided for required strength in blow molding, then the table top gains strength, but material overuse and heavy weight result

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetable top strengthVSAvoidmaterial consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The structural reinforcement function is segmented from the cosmetic/surface function. The thin synthetic base provides the surface and cosmetic qualities, while separate reinforcement strips provide the structural strength, eliminating the need for thick material throughout the entire table top.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The table top combines different materials with complementary properties: synthetic material (lightweight, durable, low maintenance) for the base, and metal or wood strips (high strength-to-weight ratio) for reinforcement. This composite approach achieves required strength with minimal total material consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Shape

If traditional wood is used for table top, then the table top has good appearance, but large amount of wood consumption and constant maintenance are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetable top appearanceVSAvoidwood consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the material parameter from natural wood to synthetic materials that can be manufactured with precise control over appearance properties. The synthetic material can be molded to replicate wood grain patterns or provide uniform solid colors, achieving aesthetic goals while eliminating the environmental and maintenance drawbacks of natural wood.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Adaptability or versatility

If fiberboard or flake board is used as wood substitute, then the table top can be made of alternative material, but similar defects to wood remain

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial alternativeVSAvoidmaintenance requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention uses a composite construction where a synthetic material base (such as polyethylene, polypropylene, or other polymers) provides inherent resistance to moisture, insects, and decay, while reinforcement strips add structural integrity. This composite approach eliminates the reliability issues of fiberboard and flake board while maintaining design flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The composite table top achieves better applicability, low maintenance, and enhanced mechanical strength while minimizing material consumption and weight, offering a more environmentally friendly alternative to traditional wood and synthetic materials.

Implementation Method 1

the bottom plate is produced through a vacuum forming process

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVacuum forming: Vacuum

Data Source

PatentUS10842260B2Composite table top
Publication Date: 2020.11.24 NEW TEC INTEGRATION (XIAMEN) CO LTD
  • US10842260B2 patent drawing
  • US10842260B2 patent drawing
  • US10842260B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A composite table top including a top plate having an outer and an inner surface, a bottom plate comprising a plurality of projections, each of the plurality of projections having a top defining a top surface. The composite table top has at least a pair of reinforcement inserts disposed at two opposite edges of the bottom plate. The sum of the top surfaces of the plurality of projections is 30%-70% of the upper surface of the bottom plate.