Composite Tire Support Structure for Load Distribution and Bump Stop

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current tire support structures face challenges in efficiently distributing loads and maintaining resilience under varying conditions, particularly when exceeding nominal loads, which can lead to structural damage and accelerated wear.

Innovation Solution

A resilient composite structure comprising a support element with elastomeric joints and reinforcement membranes, specifically designed to connect the inner surface of an outer tread band to the outer surface of a hub, utilizing fiberglass-reinforced rubber and interwoven cords to provide flexibility and structural integrity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a rigid support structure is used to maintain structural integrity, then strength is improved, but resilience and ability to absorb excessive loads deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidresilience under excessive loads
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The support structure employs a composite construction combining rigid elongated reinforcements (fiberglass or metal) embedded within a resilient elastomeric matrix material. This composite approach allows the structure to simultaneously exhibit strength from the rigid reinforcements and resilience from the elastomeric matrix, resolving the contradiction between structural integrity and resilience under excessive loads.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The invention applies different material properties to different regions of the support structure. The elastomeric matrix provides cushioning and resilience throughout, while rigid reinforcements are strategically positioned to provide strength where needed. The reinforcement membrane with cords is positioned adjacent to the second side of the support element to provide localized reinforcement without compromising overall resilience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If load distribution is improved to prevent structural damage, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprevention of structural damageVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The composite structure of rigid reinforcements within an elastomeric matrix inherently provides load distribution capabilities. The elastomeric matrix acts as a load-distributing medium that spreads forces across the rigid reinforcements, preventing stress concentration and structural damage without requiring additional complex load-distribution mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The reinforcement membrane acts as a thin film structure that distributes loads across the support element. The membrane with interwoven cords provides a lightweight, relatively simple structure that enhances load distribution and prevents structural damage without significantly increasing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

3Strength

If reinforcement is added to prevent structural damage, then strength is improved, but weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance to structural damageVSAvoidsupport structure weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcement membrane is designed as a thin film structure with cords, providing necessary reinforcement while minimizing weight addition. This thin film approach delivers strength enhancement without the significant weight penalty that would result from thicker or more substantial reinforcement elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The use of composite materials with rigid reinforcements embedded in an elastomeric matrix provides high strength-to-weight ratio. The rigid reinforcements (fiberglass or metal) offer superior strength properties compared to solid elastomeric structures of equivalent weight, while the elastomeric matrix provides structural continuity and damage tolerance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively distributes loads, reduces deflection, and prevents structural damage by acting as a 'bump stop' under excessive loads, while maintaining resilience and energy efficiency through the use of elastomeric joints and reinforcement membranes.

Implementation Method 1

an elastomeric joint body connecting said first end of said support element to said first surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

a reinforcement membrane connected to said first end of said support element, said reinforcement membrane having a first end and a second end, said first end of said reinforcement membrane positioned adjacent to said second side of said support element and said second end of said reinforcement membrane positioned on the same side of the support element as said first side of said support element

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTensile strength: Tension

Data Source

PatentEP3833551B1Resilient composite structural support
Publication Date: 2024.07.24 MICHELIN & CO (CIE GEN DES ESTAB MICHELIN)
  • EP3833551B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3833551B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3833551B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An improved resilient composite structure for connecting two surfaces together where the structure includes an elastomeric joint body connected to one of the two surfaces and at least one reinforcement membrane at one end of the resilient composite structure, where the reinforcement membrane wraps around the end of the resilient composite structure such that one end of the reinforcement membrane is positioned along a side of the resilient composite structure and the other end of the reinforcement membrane is positioned on the opposite side of the resilient composite structure.