Integral Composite Wing-Body Joint Pad-Up Area

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional mechanical butt joints used in aircraft construction are heavy, costly, and prone to fatigue, requiring numerous bolts and additional components that increase weight and operational costs.

Innovation Solution

The use of integral composite panels with interleaved plies of composite material to form a single, lightweight wing structure that integrates with a framework, reducing the need for mechanical fasteners by distributing loads through a built-up pad-up area.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If traditional mechanical butt joints with numerous bolts are used, then bearing requirements are met, but weight increases and operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebearing capabilityVSAvoidjoint weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the wing panel and joint structure into a single integral composite component. The overlapping plies of composite material create a built-up pad-up area that is continuous and integrated, eliminating the need for separate mechanical joints, ribs, and bolts. This integration maintains bearing capability while significantly reducing weight by removing unnecessary mechanical fastening components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite materials consisting of multiple overlapping plies arranged in an interwoven pattern. This composite construction creates a pad-up area with enhanced bearing capability that matches or exceeds traditional mechanical joints, while being lighter and more fatigue-resistant. The composite structure distributes loads effectively across the joint area without requiring numerous bolts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If traditional mechanical joints with multiple parts are used, then bearing requirements are met, but production time and manufacturing complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebearing capabilityVSAvoidjoint structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple separate joint components (ribs, bolts, fasteners) into a single integral composite structure. The overlapping plies form a unified pad-up area that performs all the functions previously requiring separate parts, thereby reducing manufacturing complexity and production time while maintaining bearing capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The composite structure is segmented into multiple plies that are overlapped and interwoven to create the pad-up area. This segmentation at the material level allows for flexible design and manufacturing of the joint structure as a single integrated component, simplifying production compared to assembling multiple separate mechanical parts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Strength

If traditional bolted joints are used, then initial strength is achieved, but fatigue over time requires maintenance and replacement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinitial joint strengthVSAvoidfatigue resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses composite materials with overlapping plies that create a fatigue-resistant pad-up area. The composite construction distributes stresses more evenly across the joint, eliminating stress concentrations that occur at bolt holes and mechanical fasteners. This results in superior fatigue resistance and long-term reliability without requiring periodic maintenance or replacement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical bolted joint system with a composite material-based pad-up area. This substitution eliminates the mechanical fasteners that are prone to fatigue failure, thereby improving long-term reliability and reducing maintenance requirements while maintaining initial joint strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS7837148B2Composite wing-body joint
Publication Date: 2010.11.23 THE BOEING CO
  • US7837148B2 patent drawing
  • US7837148B2 patent drawing
  • US7837148B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of integral composite panels and joints for composite structures are described In one implementation, an integrated panel spanning substantially the entire wingspan of an aircraft, includes at least a center portion and a pair of outwardly projecting wing portions. The portions may include a skin formed from successive layers or plies of composite material which overlap and offset at the joint between respective sections creating a pad-up area to carry loads between the portions. In a particular implementation, the skin is laid over one or more structural stringers which are transitioned into the joints between sections such as by tapering of the thickness and/or stiffness of the stringer.