Compound Aircraft Control System for Redundant Effector Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Compound aircraft control systems lack the ability to automatically optimize control settings for multiple user-selectable objectives, such as speed maximization, vibration reduction, and fuel consumption minimization, due to complexity and redundancy in control options.

Innovation Solution

A control system that selects and applies combinations of trim control settings based on user-defined objectives, using a look-up database and sensor feedback to manage redundant control effectors, allowing pilots to achieve desired flight conditions with reduced complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple redundant control effectors are used in compound aircraft, then control versatility and performance optimization are improved, but control system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol versatilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A control system computer acts as an intermediary between the pilot's control inputs and multiple redundant control effectors. The computer automatically distributes control commands among available effectors based on current flight conditions and system status, eliminating the need for the pilot to directly manage complex redundant control configurations while maintaining control versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The control system dynamically adjusts control parameter distribution among redundant effectors based on changing flight conditions. The system monitors parameters such as flight phase, control surface position, and system health status to optimize the allocation of control authority, allowing automatic adaptation without increasing pilot workload or system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If automatic control optimization is implemented for multiple objectives, then flight performance is improved, but control system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflight performanceVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system pre-configures multiple control effectors and their associated control laws before flight operations begin. Trim settings, control surface mappings, and optimization parameters are established in advance, allowing the system to automatically optimize flight performance during operation without requiring complex real-time calculations or increasing operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If redundant control options are provided for trimmed flight, then control flexibility is improved, but pilot workload increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol flexibilityVSAvoidpilot workload
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The control system automatically manages the distribution of control commands among redundant effectors without requiring direct pilot intervention. The system monitors flight conditions and autonomously adjusts control surface positions and trim settings, allowing the aircraft to self-optimize performance while reducing pilot workload to simple supervisory inputs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS8463465B2Compound aircraft control system and method
Publication Date: 2013.06.11 PIASECKI AIRCRAFT CORP
  • US8463465B2 patent drawing
  • US8463465B2 patent drawing
  • US8463465B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The Invention is a control system for a compound aircraft. A compound aircraft has features of both a helicopter and a fixed wing aircraft and provides redundant control options. The control system allows an authorized person to select any of plurality of operational objectives each of which is designed to achieve any particular command.