Compound Helicopter Asymmetric Wings for Rotor Interference Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The aerodynamic interference between the rotor and fixed wings in compound helicopters reduces flight efficiency by increasing drag and requiring additional power, and cyclic pitch control further exacerbates this issue by reducing the lift-drag ratio.

Innovation Solution

The system employs asymmetric fixed wings and reduces the cyclic pitch control operation to allow a lift difference between the advancing and retreating sides of the rotor, combined with asymmetric wing configurations to minimize aerodynamic interference, thereby balancing the rolling moments and optimizing lift and drag.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If cyclic pitch control is performed to equalize lift between advancing and retreating sides, then flight stability is improved, but lift-drag ratio decreases and flight efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflight stabilityVSAvoidflight efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by making the fixed wings asymmetric to each other. Specifically, the right fixed wing (on the retreating side) has a larger wingspan than the left fixed wing (on the advancing side). This asymmetric configuration compensates for the lift difference between advancing and retreating sides without requiring cyclic pitch control, thereby maintaining flight stability while preserving the lift-drag ratio and improving flight efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Stability of the object's composition

If cyclic pitch control is performed to eliminate lift difference between advancing and retreating sides, then aerodynamic balance is improved, but additional power is required and flight efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaerodynamic balanceVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs asymmetric fixed wings where the right fixed wing has a larger wingspan than the left fixed wing. This geometric asymmetry creates a deliberate lift difference that counterbalances the aerodynamic interference from the rotor, achieving aerodynamic balance without cyclic pitch control. Consequently, additional power consumption is eliminated and flight efficiency is improved.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the harmful aerodynamic interference from the rotor into a beneficial effect. By making the right fixed wing larger, the patent utilizes the stronger downwash from the retreating side to generate additional lift on that side, thereby balancing the overall aerodynamic forces without requiring additional power input or cyclic pitch control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Ease of manufacture

If symmetric fixed wings are used, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but aerodynamic interference from rotor increases drag and reduces flight efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoiddrag
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from symmetric to asymmetric fixed wings, where the right fixed wing has a larger wingspan than the left. This asymmetric design, while slightly more complex to manufacture, significantly reduces aerodynamic interference drag by balancing the lift distribution. The improved aerodynamic efficiency results in reduced drag and better flight performance, justifying the moderate increase in manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration improves flight efficiency by reducing the need for additional power and maintaining stable flight attitudes without pilot intervention, enhancing the lift-drag ratio and aerodynamic performance.

Implementation Method 1

influence of an aerodynamic interference between the rotor and the fixed wings is reduced

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic interference: Interference

Implementation Method 2

Lift that supports the weight of the compound helicopter is generated by the rotor in hovering, while in forward flight it is generated by the fixed wings as well as the rotor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLift generation: Aerofoil

Data Source

PatentUS12397910B2Flight efficiency improving system for compound helicopter
Publication Date: 2025.08.26 SUBARU CORP
  • US12397910B2 patent drawing
  • US12397910B2 patent drawing
  • US12397910B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a flight efficiency improving system for a compound helicopter with a rotor and fixed wings. In forward flight of the compound helicopter, the flight efficiency improving system does not perform a cyclic pitch control of the rotor so as to allow a difference in lift generated by the rotor between an advancing side and a retreating side of the rotor, or the flight efficiency improving system performs the cyclic pitch control to an extent that does not completely eliminate the difference. The fixed wings are provided respectively on left and right sides of a body and are asymmetric to each other so that influence of an aerodynamic interference between the rotor and the fixed wings is reduced.