Chemical Compound Identifier Hierarchy for Consistent Spectral Search

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing frameworks for generating and searching metadata in spectral libraries face inconsistencies and conflicts due to the lack of cross-checking and prioritization of varying annotation types, leading to inconsistent and conflicting identifiers for the same compounds.

Innovation Solution

A system that employs an annotation ranking schema to prioritize and cross-check different annotation types, generating consistent identifiers for compounds and resolving conflicts, allowing for annotation type-agnostic searching.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple annotation types are used to describe chemical compounds in spectral libraries, then the versatility and information richness of the library is improved, but inconsistencies and conflicts in identifiers arise due to lack of cross-checking and prioritization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveannotation type versatilityVSAvoididentifier consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by transforming multiple annotation types into a standardized hierarchical structure with defined ranking levels. Different annotation types (e.g., chemical name, formula, structure) are converted into comparable parameters with assigned priorities, enabling consistent identifier generation while preserving the versatility of multiple annotation approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the annotation data into hierarchical levels (e.g., primary, secondary, tertiary identifiers) with distinct ranking priorities. This segmentation allows each annotation type to be processed independently according to its importance level, resolving conflicts by systematically selecting identifiers from highest to lowest priority levels without losing the value of diverse annotation types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If annotation data is processed without cross-checking and prioritization, then the processing speed and simplicity is improved, but search efficiency and accuracy deteriorate due to inconsistent identifiers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidsearch accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by performing cross-checking and prioritization of annotation data during the identifier generation phase, before the actual spectral library searches are executed. The hierarchical ranking schema pre-establishes the correct identifier selection logic, so that during search operations, the system can quickly retrieve accurate results without re-processing the annotation consistency logic, thus maintaining both speed and accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If a hierarchical ranking schema is implemented to prioritize annotation types, then identifier consistency and search accuracy are improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentifier consistencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent manages system complexity by transforming the complex problem of multi-annotation type reconciliation into a simpler parameter-based ranking system. Each annotation type is assigned a numerical priority level, and identifier selection follows a straightforward hierarchical algorithm that checks higher priority levels first. This parameter transformation reduces the cognitive and computational complexity compared to handling unstructured annotation conflicts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Loss of information

If multiple identifiers are generated for the same compound from different annotation types, then the information completeness is improved, but the difficulty of managing and searching the library increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completenessVSAvoidsearch ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple identifiers from different annotation types into a unified hierarchical identifier structure. Instead of treating multiple identifiers as separate, potentially conflicting entities, the system combines them into a single standardized format with embedded priority information. This merging preserves all annotation information while providing a consistent interface for search operations, making the library easier to manage and query.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS20260064649A1Hierarchy-based chemical compound library identifier generation
Publication Date: 2026.03.05 HIGHCHEM SRO
  • US20260064649A1 patent drawing
  • US20260064649A1 patent drawing
  • US20260064649A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments described herein relate to a process for generation of annotation-accessible library spectral content. A system can comprise a memory that stores, and a processor that executes, computer executable components. The computer executable components can comprise an identifying component that identifies chemical compound data describing a chemical compound, and a generating component that generates an identifier from the chemical compound data based on an annotation type of the compound data as compared to an annotation ranking schema.