Compressed Air Unit Drain Valve Control Logic

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for controlling compressed air units are voluminous, require many valves and connections, and are limited to discharging condensate without considering other system parameters or performing additional functions.

Innovation Solution

A method that controls at least two controllable drain valves based on system parameters such as pressure and liquid levels, ensuring that valves with different feed-side pressures cannot be open simultaneously, allowing for a compact configuration and enabling the valves to perform multiple functions beyond condensate discharge.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple valves and connections are used to discharge condensate from each pressure stage, then condensate discharge function is achieved, but device complexity and volume increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecondensate discharge functionVSAvoidnumber of valves and connections
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies multi-functionality by enabling drain valves to perform multiple functions: discharging condensate from different pressure stages and providing pressure relief/blow-off functions. The controller manages multiple functions through a single valve system, eliminating the need for separate dedicated valves for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges multiple condensate discharge functions into a single drain valve system. Instead of having separate valves for each pressure stage, the invention combines all condensate discharge operations through one or two controllable drain valves managed by a central controller, significantly reducing the number of components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Reliability

If separate components are used for pressure relief and condensate discharge, then each function is reliably performed, but device volume and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure relief functionVSAvoiddevice volume
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The drain valves are designed to perform both condensate discharge and pressure relief functions. The controller determines when to open the drain valve based on whether condensate discharge or pressure relief is needed, allowing a single component to serve multiple purposes and reduce overall device volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If drain valves are controlled based only on local feed-side parameters, then simple control is achieved, but system-wide coordination and safety are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol simplicityVSAvoidsystem coordination
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The controller receives feedback from multiple sources including feed-side parameters (liquid level, local pressure) and system-side parameters (pressure in other stages, overall system state). This multi-source feedback enables coordinated control of drain valves across different pressure stages, ensuring safe operation while maintaining relatively simple control logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The controller acts as an intermediary that coordinates between different pressure stages and drain valves. It processes information from various sensors and makes centralized decisions about valve operation, ensuring system-wide coordination without requiring complex direct communication between all components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Productivity

If drain valves are allowed to open simultaneously at different pressure stages, then condensate discharge efficiency is improved, but condensate flow from high to low pressure areas occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecondensate discharge efficiencyVSAvoidcondensate flow from high to low pressure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The controller monitors pressure conditions at different pressure stages and uses this feedback to control drain valve operation. It determines the appropriate timing for opening drain valves based on pressure differentials, ensuring that valves open in a sequence that prevents harmful condensate flow while maintaining efficient discharge.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The controller performs preliminary assessment of pressure conditions before opening drain valves. It checks whether opening a drain valve would create harmful pressure differentials that could cause condensate to flow from high to low pressure areas, and only permits valve opening when conditions are safe.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS8961147B2Method for controlling a compressed air unit and compressed air unit for applying such a method
Publication Date: 2015.02.24 ATLAS COPCO AIRPOWER NV
  • US8961147B2 patent drawing
  • US8961147B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Method for controlling a compressed air unit which is provided with at least one controllable drain valve (8, 27, 37 or 39), where the above-mentioned drain valve (8, 27, 37 or 39) are controlled at least on the basis of a system parameter which is not a system parameter on the feed side of the drain valve (8, 27, 37 or 39).