Compressed Air System Malfunction Detection via Simulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for detecting malfunctions in compressed air systems, such as those in motor vehicles, require precise pressure measurements and additional expensive electronic sensors, making them inefficient and costly.

Innovation Solution

A method that measures a state variable, such as pressure or time interval, downstream of the compressor to detect malfunctions by comparing the change in this variable with a threshold value, allowing for adaptive regeneration and minimal sensor effort.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If precise pressure measurement is used to detect malfunctions, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and cost increase due to need for expensive electronic sensors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure measurement precisionVSAvoidsensor effort
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a simulation approach where a simulation unit replicates the expected behavior of the compressed air system under normal conditions. By comparing actual sensor data with simulated data, the system can detect malfunctions without requiring additional expensive sensors. The simulation creates a virtual model that copies the system's expected performance, enabling anomaly detection through data comparison rather than direct measurement enhancement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex mechanical measurement systems with computational methods. Instead of using precise pressure sensors and electronic measurement devices, the system uses a control unit that performs simulations and compares data. This substitution of mechanical/electronic measurement infrastructure with computational analysis reduces hardware complexity while maintaining detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If additional electronic sensors are added to detect malfunctions, then reliability of malfunction detection is improved, but device complexity and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemalfunction detection reliabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The simulation unit creates a virtual copy of the system's expected behavior, allowing the existing sensor infrastructure to be used for malfunction detection. This approach achieves reliable detection without adding expensive electronic sensors, as the simulation provides the reference data needed to identify anomalies using already-available sensor inputs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses its own existing sensor data and computational resources to perform self-diagnosis. The control unit executes simulations and comparisons using data already collected by the system's normal operation sensors, enabling the system to monitor its own health without external additional sensors or specialized measurement equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If regeneration parameters are adapted to compensate for malfunctions, then system adaptability is improved, but control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregeneration adaptationVSAvoidcontrol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where malfunction detection results directly influence regeneration parameter adjustment. The control unit detects malfunctions through simulation comparison and automatically adapts regeneration parameters based on the detected conditions. This closed-loop feedback enables the system to self-adjust to compensate for malfunctions without requiring complex manual intervention or additional control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP3230136B1Method and system for failure detection in a pressurized air system
Publication Date: 2020.09.30 KNORR BREMSE SYSTEME FUER NUTZFAHIZEUGE GMBH
  • EP3230136B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for detecting a malfunction of a compressed-air system, wherein a state variable is measured and is stored as a first base value and a first time stamp is captured and stored in a first step (1), the compressor (13) is activated in a second step (2), the state variable is measured and is stored as a comparison value in a third step (3), the value difference between the comparison value and the base value is formed in a fourth step (4), the value difference is compared with a threshold value in a value comparison step (5), a second time stamp is captured and the time interval with respect to the first time stamp is calculated in a sixth step (6) if the value difference is greater than or equal to the threshold value, the deviation of the time interval from a time interval reference value is determined in a time comparison step (7), and, if the deviation is outside of a tolerance interval, a malfunction is associated with the deviation in a diagnosis step (8).