Compressed Air System Configuration Automation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The design of compressed air systems is a complex and time-consuming process requiring significant user involvement and expertise, often resulting in suboptimal configurations due to the vast number of possible component combinations and the need for manual simulation and evaluation.

Innovation Solution

A computer-assisted method using a branched data structure and branch-and-bound algorithm to systematically generate and evaluate compressed air system configurations, minimizing user involvement by automating the process and ensuring the optimal configuration is found.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual design and simulation of compressed air system configurations is performed, then user expertise and control are utilized, but the design process becomes time-consuming and may not guarantee optimal solutions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign qualityVSAvoiddesign time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical design process with an automated computer-based system that uses algorithms to generate and evaluate configurations. The computer automatically creates configuration models, performs simulations, and ranks options, eliminating the need for manual iteration while maintaining or improving design quality through systematic evaluation of all possible configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service design by allowing users to input basic requirements and constraints, after which the computer autonomously generates multiple configuration options, evaluates them through simulation, and presents optimized solutions without requiring continuous user intervention or expertise in system design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If the number of component combinations is increased to explore more configuration options, then the likelihood of finding optimal solutions improves, but the complexity of the design process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration optionsVSAvoiddesign process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex design process into distinct automated stages: component selection, configuration model generation, simulation execution, and evaluation ranking. Each stage is handled independently by the computer system, managing complexity through systematic breakdown of the overall design task into manageable computational steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically varies multiple parameters including component types, quantities, arrangements, and operational settings to generate diverse configuration options. By systematically changing these parameters within defined constraints, the computer explores the solution space efficiently without requiring manual intervention for each parameter combination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If multiple simulations are performed to evaluate different configurations, then accurate assessment of configuration quality is achieved, but the computational resources and time required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration evaluation accuracyVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by performing simulations on a selective basis - the computer generates multiple configurations but only simulates and evaluates those that meet preliminary criteria or represent promising solutions. This approach provides sufficient evaluation accuracy for making design decisions without exhaustively simulating every possible configuration, thus conserving computational resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20250005225A1Method for providing at least one design configuration of a compressed-air system
Publication Date: 2025.01.02 KAESER KOMPRESSOREN SE
  • US20250005225A1 patent drawing
  • US20250005225A1 patent drawing
  • US20250005225A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for providing at least one design configuration of a compressed air system (1) comprising at least two compressors (11,12) connected in parallel, wherein the method comprises the following steps. Receiving component data (Dk) by a computer, wherein the component data (Dk) comprises a compressor list (Lv) containing a plurality of compressors (V1, V2, . . . , Vn) of different types. Generating a branched data structure (B) by the computer. Generating compressed air system configuration data (DKonf1, DKonf2) by a computer indicating compressed air system configurations (Konf1, Konf2) in which two of the compressors from the compressor list (V1, V2, . . . , Vn) are connected in parallel. Calculating at least one quality value by the computer for at least one of the compressed air system configurations (Konf1, Konf2) based on the compressed air system configuration (Konf1, Konf2) and at least one technical parameter (Kt) of the compressors of the compressed air system configuration (Konf1, Konf2), wherein the at least one quality value indicates the quality of the compressed air system configuration (Konf1, Konf2) with respect to a quality criterion, preferably specified by a user. Providing at least one compressed air system configuration (Konf1, Konf2) with in each case at least one assigned quality value by the computer.