Low-Overhead Error Correction for Compressed Memory Requests

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional processor architectures face inefficiencies and scalability challenges in handling graph analytics due to the sparse structure of graph data, leading to poor resource usage, cache thrashing, and high synchronization overheads, which limits the performance of graph processing workloads.

Innovation Solution

A specialized computing system architecture featuring multi-threaded graph processing cores with optimized memory access and synchronization mechanisms, including a hardware distributed global address space and offload engines, to efficiently handle graph workloads by hiding memory latency and reducing synchronization overheads.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional processor architectures are used for graph analytics, then general-purpose computing is maintained, but resource usage efficiency deteriorates due to sparse data structure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegraph processing efficiencyVSAvoidresource usage efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments graph processing workloads into distinct phases (computation phases and data transfer phases) and assigns different processing cores to handle each phase. Graph processing cores specialize in computational operations on graph data, while dense compute cores handle data transfer and preprocessing, creating an efficient division of labor that reduces resource waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a new architectural dimension by adding specialized graph processing cores alongside traditional dense compute cores. This creates a multi-dimensional processing architecture where different core types can operate simultaneously on different aspects of graph analytics, improving overall efficiency without sacrificing general-purpose capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If conventional memory access mechanisms are used, then memory availability is maintained, but cache thrashing increases due to sparse graph data access patterns

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvememory access efficiencyVSAvoidcache thrashing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements local quality optimization by providing specialized memory access mechanisms tailored to graph data structures. The system uses adjacency lists and other graph-specific data representations that optimize memory access patterns for sparse graphs, reducing cache misses and improving memory access efficiency for graph workloads.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If traditional synchronization mechanisms are used, then coordination between cores is maintained, but synchronization overhead increases for graph processing workloads

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesynchronization correctnessVSAvoidsynchronization overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent achieves continuous useful action by overlapping computation and data transfer operations. Graph processing cores can continuously perform computational work while dense compute cores simultaneously handle data transfer, eliminating idle waiting time and reducing the need for frequent synchronization, thereby maintaining correctness with lower overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

4Productivity

If specialized graph processing cores are introduced, then graph analytics performance is improved, but architecture complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegraph analytics performanceVSAvoidarchitecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent achieves universality by designing an architecture where specialized graph processing cores and dense compute cores can handle both graph-specific workloads and general-purpose computing tasks. The heterogeneous core design allows the system to maintain versatility while optimizing for graph analytics performance through specialized hardware components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12455741B2Low overhead error correction code
Publication Date: 2025.10.28 INTEL CORP
  • US12455741B2 patent drawing
  • US12455741B2 patent drawing
  • US12455741B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Memory requests are protected by encoding memory requests to include error correction codes. A subset of bits in a memory request are compared to a pre-defined pattern to determine whether the subset of bits matches a pre-defined pattern, where a match indicates that a compression can be applied to the memory request. The error correction code is generated for the memory request and the memory request is encoded to remove the subset of bits, add the error correction code, and add at least one metadata bit to the memory request to generate a protected version of the memory request, where the at least one metadata bit identifies whether the compression was applied to the memory request.