Data Compression Analysis Service Under Time and Resource Constraints

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The challenge lies in efficiently selecting the most appropriate data compression technique for various types of data, as existing methods often require significant resources and are limited by time, operational costs, and other constraints, making it difficult to determine the optimal compression method amidst growing data volumes and diverse compression techniques.

Innovation Solution

A data compression service that employs a rules-based analysis and machine-learning techniques to select the most suitable compression techniques based on data characteristics, metadata, and service restrictions, generating data compression candidates while enforcing constraints such as time limits and resource allocation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If multiple compression techniques are analyzed to select the optimal one, then compression effectiveness is improved, but resource consumption and time required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompression effectivenessVSAvoidtime required for analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of data characteristics before compression to pre-determine the most suitable compression technique. By analyzing data patterns, types, and properties in advance, the system can select the optimal compression method without requiring extensive trial-and-error analysis during the actual compression process, thus reducing time loss while maintaining compression effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameters of compression technique selection by using multiple different compression algorithms with varying parameters and approaches. By adjusting and comparing results from different compression techniques with different parameters, the system identifies the most effective method for specific data characteristics, achieving high compression effectiveness without requiring exhaustive analysis of all possible techniques.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive data analysis is performed to determine optimal compression technique, then compression quality is improved, but operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompression qualityVSAvoidoperational costs
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs partial analysis of data characteristics rather than exhaustive analysis of all possible compression techniques. By analyzing key data properties such as data type, size, and pattern recognition, the system determines sufficient information to select an appropriate compression technique without performing excessive analysis, thus maintaining compression quality while reducing operational costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses automated rules-based analysis and machine learning models to self-determine the optimal compression technique without requiring manual intervention or extensive external resources. The automated system analyzes data characteristics and selects compression methods independently, reducing operational costs while maintaining high compression quality through intelligent algorithm selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If resource constraints are imposed on compression analysis, then operational efficiency is improved, but ability to select optimal technique is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidcompression technique selection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the compression technique selection process into distinct stages: data characteristic analysis, candidate technique identification, and optimal technique selection. By dividing the analysis into manageable segments with specific resource allocations for each stage, the system maintains operational efficiency while preserving the ability to select optimal compression techniques through structured, multi-phase evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs a universal framework that can handle multiple types of data and compression techniques through a single adaptable platform. The rules-based analysis and machine learning models are designed to work across diverse data types and compression algorithms, providing versatile technique selection capability while maintaining operational efficiency through a unified, resource-conscious architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS9934235B2Efficient data compression and analysis as a service
Publication Date: 2018.04.03 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US9934235B2 patent drawing
  • US9934235B2 patent drawing
  • US9934235B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Data may be efficiently analyzed and compressed as part of a data compression service. A data compression request may be received from a client indicating data to be compressed. An analysis of the data or metadata associated with the data may be performed. In at least some embodiments, this analysis may be a rules-based analysis. Some embodiments may employ one or more machine learning techniques to historical compression data to update the rules-based analysis. One or more compression techniques may be selected out of a plurality of compression techniques to be applied to the data. Data compression candidates may then be generated according to the selected compression techniques. In some embodiments, a compression service restriction may be enforced. One of the data compression candidates may be selected and sent in a response.