Compression Spring Weight Compensation for Industrial Lifting Doors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing weight compensation devices for lifting doors, such as those using tension and torsion springs, have short service lives and require significant installation space, making them inefficient and costly for long-term use, especially in industrial settings.

Innovation Solution

A weight compensation device utilizing compression springs arranged in a hollow-cylindrical guide element, which supports a rotary motion through a motion conversion device, allowing for efficient spring force utilization and compact design, with the compression spring capable of withstanding high loads for over a million lifts without deformation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If tension springs are used for weight compensation, then the door weight can be compensated, but the service life is limited to about 200,000 lifts and they require significant installation space

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice lifeVSAvoidinstallation space
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the conventional approach by using compression springs instead of tension springs. The compression springs are arranged vertically between the door leaf and the floor, converting the horizontal space requirement of tension springs into a vertical compression mechanism, thereby reducing installation space while extending service life to over one million lifts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from horizontal space utilization (tension springs mounted on side frames) to vertical space utilization (compression springs mounted between door leaf and floor). This dimensional change allows the same weight compensation function to be achieved with significantly reduced installation space requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Area of stationary object

If torsion springs are used as an alternative, then installation space is reduced, but the service life becomes even shorter at about 30,000 to 40,000 lifts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation spaceVSAvoidservice life
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the fundamental parameter of spring type from torsion to compression. Compression springs inherently provide longer service life due to their simpler stress state (unilateral compression versus torsional shear), while maintaining compact installation space through vertical arrangement between the door leaf and floor

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If hydraulic accumulators are employed, then weight compensation is achieved, but the construction becomes expensive and complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweight compensation capabilityVSAvoidconstruction complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces expensive and complex hydraulic accumulators with simple, inexpensive compression springs. Although springs are mechanical components, their simplicity, low cost, and maintenance-free operation over one million lifts make them a far more economical and less complex solution than hydraulic systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes a complex hydraulic mechanical system with a simple mechanical spring system. The compression springs directly provide the counterbalancing force through elastic deformation, eliminating the need for hydraulic fluid, seals, pumps, and control mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a long-lasting, cost-effective, and space-efficient weight compensation mechanism that effectively supports the weight of door leaves, enabling the use of spiral and drum doors with reduced maintenance needs and improved space utilization.

Implementation Method 1

at least one compression spring configured as a coil spring

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS10557296B2Weight compensation device of a lifting door with at least one compression spring
Publication Date: 2020.02.11 REJC GABRIJEL
  • US10557296B2 patent drawing
  • US10557296B2 patent drawing
  • US10557296B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a weight compensation device for a drive of a lifting door, for the position-dependent compensation of the weight force of a door leaf of the lifting door, with a force transmission unit which can be coupled to the drive in order to carry out an opening movement which raises the door leaf and a closing movement which lowers the door leaf, wherein at least one compression spring is provided which is arranged in such a way that it supports the opening movement. The invention also relates to a lifting door, in particular an industrial lifting door, which has a door leaf, with a drive, such as a motor, and with a weight compensation device according to the invention.