Compressive Sampling Optical Wavemeter

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current signal processing systems face challenges in efficiently sampling signals at sub-Nyquist rates, particularly in spectroscopy and spectral imaging, where conventional methods require more measurements than necessary, leading to increased data load and complexity.

Innovation Solution

The development of compressive sampling methods using optical components with transmissive and opaque elements, diffraction gratings, and sensors to disperse and detect optical signals, allowing for fewer measurements to estimate signal values by employing transmission or reflection functions that optimize measurement efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional sampling methods are used in spectroscopy and spectral imaging, then signal characterization can be achieved, but the number of measurements required increases leading to increased data load and system complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal characterization accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the sampling process into multiple stages using wavelet decomposition, separating signal components into different frequency bands. This allows selective sampling of only the most significant components, reducing the total number of measurements needed while maintaining reconstruction accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial sampling by taking fewer measurements than the full Nyquist rate would require. By using compressive sampling techniques with carefully designed measurement matrices and sparsity assumptions, the system achieves accurate signal reconstruction with significantly reduced measurement count, directly addressing the contradiction between measurement precision and device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Productivity

If sub-Nyquist sampling rates are used, then data acquisition efficiency improves, but measurement reliability becomes more difficult to ensure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata acquisition efficiencyVSAvoidmeasurement reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms in the signal reconstruction process, where the measured data is iteratively processed through wavelet thresholding and inversion algorithms. This feedback loop adjusts the reconstruction based on the actual measurements, ensuring reliability is maintained even at sub-Nyquist rates by continuously validating and refining the signal estimate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the sampling parameters dynamically by adapting the wavelet decomposition level and sampling rate based on signal characteristics. This allows the system to maintain reliability by adjusting parameters to match the actual signal content while operating at sub-Nyquist rates for improved productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If more measurements are taken to characterize signals accurately, then signal estimation improves, but the data load and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal estimation accuracyVSAvoiddata load
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential information from the signal by using wavelet-based compression to identify and retain only the most significant frequency components. This extraction process removes redundant data while preserving the core signal characteristics, thereby reducing data load while maintaining estimation accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial sampling strategies that take fewer measurements than traditionally required. By leveraging sparsity assumptions and compressive sampling theory, the system achieves accurate signal estimation with a reduced number of measurements, directly reducing data load while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces the number of measurements required to characterize signals, enabling more efficient data acquisition and processing in spectroscopy and imaging while maintaining signal fidelity, thereby reducing data load and system complexity.

Implementation Method 1

The spectrum of the optical signal is dispersed across the optical component

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffraction: Diffraction

Implementation Method 2

An optical component with a plurality of transmissive elements and a plurality of opaque elements is created

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbsorption: Absorption (EM radiation)

Data Source

PatentUS7616306B2Compressive sampling and signal inference
Publication Date: 2009.11.10 DUKE UNIV
  • US7616306B2 patent drawing
  • US7616306B2 patent drawing
  • US7616306B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An optical wavemeter includes a slit, a diffraction grating, a mask, a complementary grating, and a detector. A monochromatic source is incident on the slit. The diffraction grating produces an image of the slit in an image plane at a horizontal position that is wavelength dependent. The mask has a two-dimensional pattern of transmission variations and produces different vertical intensity channels for different spectral channels. The complementary grating produces a stationary image of the slit independent of wavelength. The detector measures vertical variations in intensity of the stationary image, and the mask is created so that the number of measurements made by the detector is less than the number of spectral channels sampled.