Compressive Sensing Compression With Joint Quality Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional signal compression systems, particularly those using compressive sensing, often require higher bit rates to achieve comparable image quality to traditional methods like JPEG, and lack efficient control over compression ratio and quantization level, leading to suboptimal data rate and quality tradeoffs.

Innovation Solution

Implementing joint image compression and quality control by determining a functional relationship between compression ratio and quantization level, allowing for reduced bit rates while maintaining image quality, using a target indicator to adjust these parameters non-linearly, and employing a sensing matrix to generate compressive sensing measurements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If conventional compressive sensing is used for signal compression, then compression is achieved, but higher bit rates are required to maintain image quality compared to traditional methods

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidbit rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by dynamically adjusting the quantization level based on a functional relationship with the compression ratio. This allows the system to optimize the balance between bit rate reduction and image quality preservation by varying the quantization parameter according to the desired compression level, thereby achieving lower bit rates while maintaining acceptable quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements dynamics by using a joint control mechanism that adaptively adjusts both compression ratio and quantization level based on a target indicator. This dynamic adjustment allows the encoder to respond to different quality requirements and transmission conditions, optimizing the bit rate-quality tradeoff in real-time rather than using fixed parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If conventional compressive sensing is used, then compression is achieved, but efficient control over compression ratio and quantization level is lacking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol over compression parametersVSAvoiddata transmission efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback control by using a joint control mechanism that monitors the target indicator (either quality or bit rate) and adjusts the compression ratio and quantization level accordingly. This feedback loop ensures that the system maintains optimal performance by continuously adapting parameters based on the desired outcome, providing both ease of operation and transmission efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system achieves universality by designing a control mechanism that can operate with different target indicators (quality-based or bit-rate-based) and adapt to various compression scenarios. This multi-functional approach allows the same encoder to efficiently handle different application requirements without needing separate control systems, thereby improving both ease of operation and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Quantity of substance

If quantization level is increased to reduce bit rate, then compression efficiency improves, but decoded signal quality deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompressed data sizeVSAvoiddecoded signal quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves this contradiction by dynamically changing the quantization level parameter based on its functional relationship with the compression ratio. Instead of using a fixed high quantization level, the system adjusts the quantization parameter adaptively, allowing for lower bit rates when quality requirements are less stringent and higher quality when needed, thereby optimizing the tradeoff between compressed data size and decoded signal quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10440376B2Compressive sensing with joint signal compression and quality control
Publication Date: 2019.10.08 NOKIA OF AMERICA CORP
  • US10440376B2 patent drawing
  • US10440376B2 patent drawing
  • US10440376B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An encoder determines a compression ratio for compressive sensing and a quantization level used to quantize a media signal based on a target indicator. The encoder accesses compressive sensing measurements performed using the compression ratio and quantizes the compressive sensing measurements based on the quantization level. A decoder receives a compressed signal generated from the signal acquired by the signal acquisition device using the compression ratio and the quantization level. The decoder also receives information indicating the compression ratio or the quantization level. The decoder decompresses the compressed signal based on the compression ratio and the quantization level.