Centrifugal Compressor Aerostatic Bearing Rotor Stabilization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Miniaturization of centrifugal compressors leads to increased friction loss, tip clearance, and seal leakage, which reduces efficiency, and existing solutions fail to stabilize rotational and axial movements of the rotor in smaller commercial air conditioning units, limiting the compressor's performance.

Innovation Solution

The use of radial and thrust aerostatic bearings with a low-viscous vapor-liquid two-phase fluid as a lubricating medium to reduce radial and axial oscillation of the rotor, thereby minimizing tip and seal clearances and enhancing compressor efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If centrifugal compressors are miniaturized for smaller commercial air conditioning units, then the compressor size is reduced, but friction loss increases due to decreased Reynolds number

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompressor sizeVSAvoidfriction loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the bearing type from traditional journal or ball bearings to magnetic bearings, fundamentally altering the support mechanism parameters. This enables the rotor to be supported with minimal contact, reducing friction loss while maintaining miniaturization benefits

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical bearing system with a magnetic bearing system that uses magnetic fields instead of physical contact. This substitution eliminates the friction and wear associated with traditional mechanical bearings, resolving the contradiction between miniaturization and friction loss

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Volume of moving object

If centrifugal compressors are miniaturized, then the compressor size is reduced, but tip clearance and seal leakage loss increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompressor sizeVSAvoidseal leakage loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical bearings with magnetic bearings that provide precise rotor positioning through magnetic fields. This substitution enables tighter tip clearance control and reduced seal leakage loss while maintaining the miniaturized compressor design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the rotor support mechanism to magnetic bearings, which fundamentally alters the clearance and positioning parameters. This enables precise control of tip clearance and seal gaps, reducing leakage loss despite the reduced compressor size

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If rotation speed is increased to maximize efficiency in lower tonnage chillers, then compressor efficiency is improved, but friction loss in journal bearings increases sharply

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompressor efficiencyVSAvoidfriction loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical journal bearings with magnetic bearings that support the high-speed rotor. This substitution eliminates the friction loss that would otherwise increase sharply with rotation speed, enabling the compressor to operate at higher speeds for improved efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the friction element from the bearing system by using magnetic fields instead of mechanical contact. This removal of friction allows the rotor to spin at high speeds without the penalty of increased friction loss, maximizing compressor efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Loss of energy

If ball bearings are used to support the rotor, then friction loss is reduced, but rotation speed is limited by bearing constraints

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefriction lossVSAvoidrotation speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical ball bearings with magnetic bearings that have no physical contact between moving parts. This substitution removes the rotation speed limitations inherent in ball bearing design while maintaining low friction loss, enabling the rotor to achieve higher speeds

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

5Loss of energy

If magnetic bearings are used to eliminate friction loss, then energy efficiency is improved, but rotor oscillation increases during transitional processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefriction lossVSAvoidrotor stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements active control of the magnetic bearing fields to dynamically adjust to changing operating conditions. During transitional processes like startup, shutdown, and load changes, the control system actively stabilizes the rotor, preventing excessive oscillation while maintaining the frictionless operation that improves energy efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces clearances by half, increasing centrifugal compressor efficiency by at least 10% and ensuring high-speed, stable operation with improved bearing capacity and cooling of the motor components.

Implementation Method 1

The motor uses radial aerostatic bearings to stabilize both rotation and axial displacement of the rotor. The motor also uses a thrust aerostatic bearing to balance an axial force of the rotor.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerostatic bearing:

Implementation Method 2

The radial aerostatic bearings and the thrust aerostatic bearing use a low-viscous vapor-liquid two-phase fluid as a lubricating medium.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVapor-liquid two-phase fluid lubrication: Two-Phase Flow

Implementation Method 3

A static bearing fills a clearance between the bearing and a load (e.g. a rotary shaft) with a high-pressure fluid, so as to form a high-pressure oil film or gas film to support the load.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid film lubrication: Lubrication

Data Source

PatentEP3469215B1Centrifugal compressor assembly and method of operation with an air conditioner
Publication Date: 2020.07.22 ZHEJIANG FLOWTECH INC
  • EP3469215B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3469215B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3469215B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

A centrifugal compressor assembly (100) and method (200) of operation provides a motor (196) that drives a first stage compressor (198). The motor (196) comprises a rotor (122). The motor (196) uses radial aerostatic bearings (192, 194) to stabilize rotation and axial displacement of the rotor (122). The motor (196) also uses a thrust aerostatic bearing (130) to balance an axial force of the rotor (122). The radial aerostatic bearings (192, 194) and the thrust aerostatic bearing (130) use a low-viscous vapor-liquid two- phase fluid as a lubricating medium. The radial aerostatic bearings (192,194) support the rotor (122). The thrust aerostatic bearing (130) uses porous aerostatic bearings that use a low-viscous vapor-liquid two-phase fluid, so as to reduce radial and axial oscillation of rotor (122). This enables clearance between a blade tip of an impeller (144) and a volute (146). This causes a seal clearance to be reduced by a half; thereby increasing efficiency of the centrifugal compressor (100) by at least 10 percent.