Compressor Rotor Blade Airfoil Profile Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional airfoil designs in compressor rotor blades of gas turbines suffer from aerodynamic inefficiencies, leading to performance and efficiency losses in turbomachines.

Innovation Solution

The airfoil shape is defined by Cartesian coordinate values that form smooth continuing arcs, creating a nominal profile with a unique set of points for each Z position, which are scalable and adaptable to maintain aerodynamic and mechanical efficiency across various stages of the compressor section.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If conventional airfoil designs are used in compressor rotor blades, then manufacturing and design are simpler, but aerodynamic efficiency is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaerodynamic efficiencyVSAvoidairfoil design complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by precisely modifying the geometric parameters of the airfoil profile. Specific Cartesian coordinate values (X, Y, Z) are optimized to define the airfoil shape, including the suction side profile, pressure side profile, leading edge radius, and trailing edge geometry. These parameter optimizations reduce aerodynamic losses while maintaining manufacturability through systematic variation of dimensional parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs curvature optimization in the airfoil design by defining smooth continuous surfaces through optimized coordinate points. The suction side and pressure side profiles utilize curved geometries with specific radius of curvature values at critical locations (leading edge, trailing edge, and along the span). This curvature optimization enhances flow attachment and reduces separation losses, improving aerodynamic efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

2Productivity

If optimized airfoil profiles are designed for each Z position, then aerodynamic efficiency improves, but design and manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompressor performanceVSAvoidprofile precision requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the three-dimensional airfoil into a series of two-dimensional profile sections at different Z positions along the span. Each profile section is defined by optimized Cartesian coordinates (X, Y) at that specific Z location. This segmentation allows independent optimization of each cross-section while maintaining overall three-dimensional continuity, balancing performance optimization with manufacturing feasibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal airfoil design framework that can be applied across different compressor stages and scales. The optimized coordinate system and profile methodology serve multiple functions: defining geometry for aerodynamic analysis, guiding manufacturing processes, and adapting to different operating conditions. This multi-functional approach reduces the need for separate designs for each application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Loss of energy

If smooth continuing arcs are used to connect profile sections, then aerodynamic performance improves, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaerodynamic lossesVSAvoidmanufacturing difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-defining the smooth continuous surface geometry through optimized coordinate points before manufacturing. The Cartesian coordinate values are calculated and fixed in advance to ensure continuous curvature and smooth transitions between profile sections. This preliminary geometric definition eliminates the need for complex real-time manufacturing adjustments, reducing manufacturing difficulty while maintaining aerodynamic quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enhances aerodynamic efficiency and mechanical loading, allowing the gas turbine to operate efficiently, safely, and smoothly, while being robust to manufacturing tolerances and adaptable to different scales.

Implementation Method 1

These airfoils are configured to aerodynamically interact with the fluid flows and to transfer energy to or from these fluid flows as part of power generation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic interaction: Aerofoil

Data Source

PatentUS11519272B2Compressor rotor blade airfoils
Publication Date: 2022.12.06 GE INFRASTRUCTURE TECH LLC
  • US11519272B2 patent drawing
  • US11519272B2 patent drawing
  • US11519272B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A rotor blade includes an airfoil having an airfoil shape. The airfoil shape has a nominal profile substantially in accordance with Cartesian coordinate values of X, Y and Z set forth in Table I. The Cartesian coordinate values of X, Y and Z are non-dimensional values from 0% to 100% convertible to dimensional distances expressed in a unit of distance by multiplying the Cartesian coordinate values of X, Y and Z by a scaling factor of the airfoil in the unit of distance. The X and Y values, when connected by smooth continuing arcs, define airfoil profile sections at each Z value. The airfoil profile sections at Z values are joined smoothly with one another to form a complete airfoil shape.