Compressor Inlet Guide Vane Airfoil Profile Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current compressor designs for gas turbine systems face inefficiencies in compressing gases due to suboptimal airfoil profiles, leading to reduced performance and energy consumption across multiple stages.

Innovation Solution

The development of specific airfoil profiles for compressor rotor blades and stator vanes, defined by Cartesian coordinate values, which are optimized for specific velocities and turning speeds, enhancing compression efficiency across multiple stages of the compressor.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If conventional airfoil profiles are used in compressor design, then the structure is simple and easy to manufacture, but the compression efficiency and energy performance are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompression efficiencyVSAvoidairfoil profile complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by optimizing the airfoil profile geometry through specific Cartesian coordinate values (X, Y, Z) that define the suction side, pressure side, and thickness distribution. These precise parameter specifications transform the conventional airfoil into an optimized profile that enhances compression efficiency while maintaining manufacturability through defined geometric parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements local quality by optimizing specific portions of the airfoil profile independently - the suction side, pressure side, and thickness distribution are each defined with specific coordinate values tailored to their functional requirements. This localized optimization of different airfoil regions enables enhanced overall performance while addressing specific flow characteristics in different zones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If optimized airfoil profiles with specific coordinate values are implemented, then compression efficiency and pressure ratios increase, but the design and manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompression performanceVSAvoidairfoil profile precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent specifies precise parameter changes through detailed Cartesian coordinate values for the airfoil profile, defining the suction side, pressure side, and thickness distribution with exact X, Y, Z coordinates. These parameter specifications enable optimized compression performance while providing clear manufacturing guidance through defined geometric parameters that can be precisely controlled during fabrication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of energy

If conventional airfoil designs are used across multiple compressor stages, then the design is simple and consistent, but energy consumption increases and performance is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoidairfoil design complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent reduces energy losses by implementing parameter changes in the airfoil profile geometry, optimizing the suction side, pressure side, and thickness distribution through specific coordinate values. These parameter optimizations enhance compression efficiency and reduce energy consumption across multiple compressor stages by improving flow characteristics and reducing losses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent addresses energy losses through local quality optimization of the airfoil profile, where specific portions of the airfoil (suction side, pressure side, thickness regions) are optimized with tailored coordinate values to minimize losses in critical flow areas while maintaining overall design consistency across compressor stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

These optimized airfoil profiles improve the efficiency of gas compression, leading to increased energy levels and pressure ratios, reducing energy consumption and enhancing overall compressor performance.

Implementation Method 1

Airfoil shape for inlet guide vane of a compressor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic flow guidance: Aerofoil

Implementation Method 2

compressing an intake fluid as the fluid traverses the compressor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas compression: Compression

Data Source

PatentUS10415593B2Airfoil shape for inlet guide vane of a compressor
Publication Date: 2019.09.17 GE INFRASTRUCTURE TECH LLC
  • US10415593B2 patent drawing
  • US10415593B2 patent drawing
  • US10415593B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system is provided, including an airfoil. The airfoil includes a first suction portion of a nominal airfoil profile substantially in accordance with Cartesian coordinate values of X, Y, and Z of a suction side as set forth in TABLE I to a maximum of three decimal places, wherein the X and Y values of the suction side are coordinate values that couple together to define suction side sections of the first suction portion of the nominal airfoil profile at each Z coordinate value, the suction side sections of the first suction portion of the nominal airfoil profile are coupled together to define the first suction portion, the airfoil includes an airfoil length along a Z axis, the first suction portion comprises a first portion length along the Z axis, the first portion length is less than or equal to the airfoil length, and the Cartesian coordinate values of X, Y, and Z are non-dimensional values convertible to dimensional distances.