Low-Pressure Compressor Rotor Hub Cavity for Leakage Vortex Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing low-pressure compressors in aircraft turbomachines suffer from efficiency losses due to leakage vortices caused by the clearance between cantilevered blade tips and the rotor hub, which are exacerbated by additional elements like inner shrouds and wipers, leading to increased mass and reduced efficiency.

Innovation Solution

The rotor hub is treated with non-axisymmetric internal recesses and orifices to allow passive circulation of leakage vortices from downstream to upstream, without modifying the stator part, thereby reducing the impact of these vortices on efficiency and mass.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If an inner shroud is added to the rectifier to seal the clearance between blade tips and rotor hub, then leakage vortices are reduced and efficiency is improved, but the mass of the low-pressure compressor increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveleakage vortex lossesVSAvoidmass of low-pressure compressor
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the sealing function from the stator side (inner shroud) and relocates it to the rotor side by creating a cavity in the rotor hub. This removes the need for the inner shroud assembly while maintaining the sealing effect, thereby reducing mass without compromising efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The cavity in the rotor hub acts as an intermediary structure that passively manages the leakage vortex flow. By providing a controlled pathway within the rotor hub, the invention mediates the interaction between the blade tips and rotor hub, redirecting leakage flow without requiring additional sealing components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of energy

If wipers and abradable coating tracks are added to limit leaks under the inner shroud, then compressor efficiency is improved, but the device complexity and mass increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompressor efficiencyVSAvoidcomplexity of rotor-stator assembly
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention removes the need for wipers and abradable coating tracks by integrating the leak management function directly into the rotor hub cavity structure. This extraction of sealing functions simplifies the overall device complexity while maintaining efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The rotor hub cavity is designed to passively manage leakage vortices through its geometric structure alone, without requiring active components or additional sealing mechanisms. The system serves itself by using the natural flow dynamics and cavity geometry to control leakage, eliminating the need for complex auxiliary systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Loss of energy

If the rotor hub is modified with internal recesses and orifices to manage leakage vortices, then efficiency is improved without increasing mass, but the manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveleakage vortex impactVSAvoidmanufacturing of rotor hub
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention addresses leakage management by creating internal three-dimensional cavities and pathways within the rotor hub, rather than modifying the external blade tip geometry. This dimensional approach allows complex flow control functionality to be integrated into the rotor hub structure without significantly impacting manufacturing processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the efficiency of the low-pressure compressor by minimizing leakage vortices without increasing mass, maintaining aerodynamic performance, and simplifying the compressor architecture.

Implementation Method 1

there is a pressure difference between the intrados and the extrados of the rectifier, and between the trailing and leading edges of the blades, since the pressure of the main air flow within the compressor increases from upstream to downstream

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure gradient: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

this clearance generally induces a generation and circulation of a so-called 'leakage' air vortex from downstream to upstream

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVortex circulation: Vortex Ring

Data Source

PatentEP4153867B1Part of a low pressure compressor of an aircraft engine
Publication Date: 2025.10.22 SAFRAN AERO BOOSTERS SA
  • EP4153867B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4153867B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4A
  • EP4153867B1 patent drawingFigure 4B

AI summary

The invention relates to a sub-assembly (1) for a low-pressure compressor (120) of an aircraft turbine engine (100) comprising a straightener (121) provided with cantilevered vanes (7) and a rotor hub (6) comprising a cavity (2) covered by an inner shroud (3) opposite the vanes (7), orifices (5) being made in this inner shroud (3) to allow an air flow to circulate in the downstream to upstream direction of the low-pressure compressor (120).