Turbine Compressor Rotor Assembly Thermal Expansion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The assembly of compressor rotors for aircraft gas turbines is hindered by issues such as out-of-tolerance installation, misalignment, and deformation, leading to frequent disassembly and reassembly, especially in high-pressure compressors with large diameter disks, which results in significant time losses and potential shaft line failures.

Innovation Solution

The method involves axial packing with specific pressure ranges and controlled temperature adjustments for each disk assembly, including heating and cooling steps to minimize misalignment and deformation risks, and precise measurement and alignment procedures using the GENSPECT system to ensure concentricity and flatness within tolerances, along with predictive calculations for optimal installation angles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional assembly methods are used without temperature control, then the assembly process is simpler and faster, but misalignment and deformation occur leading to out-of-tolerance installation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconcentricity and flatnessVSAvoidassembly process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies temperature parameter changes to the disks during assembly. Disks are heated to expand them for easier installation, then cooled to contract and secure them tightly, achieving precise concentricity and flatness without complex mechanical alignment devices

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary temperature control actions on the disks before assembly. By pre-heating or pre-cooling disks to specific temperatures, the assembly is prepared in advance to achieve proper fit and alignment, preventing misalignment issues during the actual assembly operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If repeated disassembly and reassembly is performed to correct installation errors, then installation accuracy may be improved, but time loss increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation accuracyVSAvoidcycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical trial-and-error alignment methods with thermally-controlled dimensional adjustment. By using temperature to control disk dimensions, the system achieves precise installation on the first attempt without requiring repeated mechanical disassembly and reassembly operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of manufacture

If original dimensional data is unavailable for maintenance, then part replacement becomes necessary, but cost and time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance feasibilityVSAvoidmaintenance time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates dimensional copies or records of disk specifications during manufacturing. These dimensional data copies are stored and used during maintenance to guide the assembly process, eliminating the need to physically reference original parts and enabling accurate reassembly without retrieving original dimensional data

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Reliability

If axial packing pressure is increased to improve assembly stability, then part detachment risk decreases, but deformation risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly stabilityVSAvoiddisk flatness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the temperature parameter of the disks to control their dimensional state during assembly. By heating disks to expand them or cooling to contract them, the system achieves proper fit and stability without requiring excessive axial packing pressure that would cause deformation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces the frequency of disassembly and reassembly, minimizes shaft line failures, and ensures accurate assembly within tolerances, thereby enhancing the reliability and efficiency of the compressor rotor installation process.

Implementation Method 1

prior to assembling the sealing disk with said at least one first rotor disk, the sealing disk is heated to a temperature ranging from 80° C. to 140° C., prior to assembling the intermediate disk with said at least one first rotor disk, the intermediate disk is heated to a temperature ranging from 120° C. to 160° C.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal expansion: Thermal Expansion

Implementation Method 2

said at least one second rotor disk is cooled down: b1) to a temperature ranging from −70° C. to −110° C.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal contraction: Thermal Contraction

Implementation Method 3

axial packing (X1) is applied with a pressure ranging from 40×105 to 60×105 Pa

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Data Source

PatentUS10711612B2Method for manufacturing a rotor for a turbine engine high-pressure compressor
Publication Date: 2020.07.14 SAFRAN AIRCRAFT ENGINES SAS
  • US10711612B2 patent drawing
  • US10711612B2 patent drawing
  • US10711612B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to the manufacturing of a rotor (23) of a high-pressure compressor. Various installation constraints are proposed in terms of temperature, angle and unevenness and/or runout defects to be considered. For example, when installing the sealing disk (25) on the first drum (27) of the rotor and/or the intermediate disk (29) on the first drum assembled with the sealing disk, axial packing (X1) is applied with a pressure ranging from 40 to 60×105 Pa.