Computational Cell Reprogramming via State-Space Modeling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cell reprogramming methods are inefficient and time-consuming, relying heavily on trial and error and wet lab techniques, which hinder the optimization of the process for converting one cell type to another.

Innovation Solution

A computational method using gene expression data, state transition matrices, and regulatory sets to model cell dynamics and identify the optimal transcription factors for reprogramming, allowing for the direct conversion of cells by minimizing distance between the initial and target cell types through a state-space representation and linear system analysis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If trial and error wet lab methods are used to identify transcription factors for reprogramming, then the process can be performed with simple computational tools, but the time and effort required increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of transcription factor identificationVSAvoidtime required for reprogramming process
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary computational analysis of gene expression data and regulatory sets before wet lab experiments. By pre-identifying candidate transcription factors through computational modeling of cell state transitions, the method eliminates the need for extensive trial-and-error experimentation, thereby reducing time loss while maintaining identification accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces mechanical wet lab trial-and-error methods with computational analysis systems. By using algorithms to analyze gene expression data and predict transcription factor effects, the system substitutes time-consuming physical experimentation with faster computational simulations, significantly reducing the time required while preserving accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If extensive trial and error experimentation is performed to optimize reprogramming, then comprehensive understanding of protein function is achieved, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunderstanding of protein functionVSAvoidreprogramming efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary computational characterization of transcription factor regulatory sets and their predicted effects on cell state transitions. This pre-analysis provides reliable insights into protein function mechanisms before experimentation begins, enabling researchers to proceed directly to targeted experiments rather than extensive trial-and-error, thereby improving productivity while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates computational models and simulations that copy and represent the complex biological interactions of transcription factors. These virtual models allow comprehensive exploration of protein function mechanisms without requiring corresponding physical experiments, providing reliable understanding while accelerating the reprogramming process through in-silico testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Stability of the object's composition

If manual directed conversion methods are used between cell types, then the process follows natural cell progression, but the time required increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenatural cell progressionVSAvoidreprogramming duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs dynamic computational models that simulate cell state transitions through the cell cycle. By modeling how transcription factors dynamically affect gene expression and cell state over time, the system identifies optimal intervention points and factor combinations that guide natural progression more efficiently, reducing reprogramming duration while maintaining biological fidelity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms in the computational model that monitor predicted cell state changes and adjust transcription factor dosing strategies accordingly. This feedback approach optimizes the reprogramming trajectory by leveraging natural cell progression signals while accelerating the process through data-driven adjustments to the reprogramming protocol.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10672501B2Control approach to cell reprogramming
Publication Date: 2020.06.02 PRESIDENT & FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE
  • US10672501B2 patent drawing
  • US10672501B2 patent drawing
  • US10672501B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method is presented for reprogramming cells of a subject. As a starting point, a biological sample of a sample cell is received from the subject, where the sample cell has a given cell type. The method includes: determining gene expression data for the sample cell from the biological sample; receiving gene expression data for a target cell having a target cell type, where the target cell type differs from the given cell type; deriving a state transition matrix which models cell dynamics; computing a regulatory set for a given transcription factor, where the regulatory set quantifies influence of the given transcription factor on a genome; expressing reprogramming of the sample cell to the target cell with a state-space representation of a linear system; and solving for the input vector in the state-space representation.