Compute Environment Management for Dynamic Task Configuration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current compute environments lack efficient methods for optimizing task execution across diverse computing resources, leading to suboptimal performance and cost utilization due to the inability to dynamically select and configure resources based on specific task requirements.

Innovation Solution

A compute environment management system that tests and selects optimal configurations for computing resources, including instance types and software configurations, to optimize task execution for performance and cost, allowing for automatic or client-approved deployment of resources based on job definitions and metrics analysis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If computing resources are statically allocated without optimization, then device complexity is reduced, but task execution efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask execution efficiencyVSAvoidcompute environment management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically selects and configures computing resources based on task requirements rather than using static allocation. The compute environment management system evaluates multiple configuration options and adapts resource deployment to match specific task characteristics, enabling optimal performance while maintaining manageable complexity through automated decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes configuration parameters of computing resources (instance types, software configurations, hardware specifications) to optimize task execution. By systematically varying and evaluating different parameter combinations, the system identifies optimal configurations for specific tasks, improving execution efficiency without requiring manual intervention for each change.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If computing resources are over-provisioned to ensure performance, then task execution reliability is improved, but cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask execution reliabilityVSAvoidcomputational resource waste
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by matching specific computing resource configurations to specific task requirements rather than using a uniform over-provisioned setup for all tasks. Each task receives precisely the computational resources it needs based on its characteristics, ensuring reliable execution while eliminating waste from unnecessary resource allocation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The compute environment management system automatically determines optimal resource allocation without manual intervention. It self-services by evaluating task requirements, selecting appropriate configurations, and deploying resources accordingly, thereby ensuring reliable task execution while minimizing resource waste through automated optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If computing resources are customized for each task, then task execution performance is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask execution performanceVSAvoidresource configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The compute environment management system serves multiple functions: it evaluates task requirements, selects optimal configurations, deploys resources, and monitors performance. This universal system handles diverse task types and configuration options through a single automated platform, improving task execution performance while managing configuration complexity centrally rather than requiring separate custom solutions for each task.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The compute environment management system acts as an intermediary between task requirements and computing resource deployment. It translates task specifications into optimal resource configurations, mediating the complexity of resource customization by providing a standardized interface for task submission and automated configuration selection, thereby improving performance without exposing users to configuration complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Loss of energy

If computing resources are dynamically selected and configured, then cost utilization is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational cost efficiencyVSAvoidcompute environment management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback mechanisms to continuously evaluate task execution performance and resource utilization. By monitoring outcomes and adjusting resource allocation based on observed results, the system optimizes cost efficiency through iterative improvement. The automated feedback loop manages the complexity of dynamic resource selection by using data-driven decisions rather than requiring complex manual configuration management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10402227B1Task-level optimization with compute environments
Publication Date: 2019.09.03 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US10402227B1 patent drawing
  • US10402227B1 patent drawing
  • US10402227B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and computer-readable media for task-level optimization of compute environments are disclosed. Execution is initiated of one or more tasks using a plurality of computing resources provisioned from a multi-tenant provider network. At least some of the computing resources vary in configuration. One or more metrics are determined that are associated with the execution of the one or more tasks. A configuration of the computing resources is selected based at least in part on the one or more metrics. A modified job definition associated with the one or more tasks is generated. The modified job definition indicates the selected configuration.