Computer-Controlled Gas Injector System for Uniform Deposition

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing semiconductor processing methods face challenges in achieving uniform deposition of layers due to imperfect control over gas flow rates, temperature, and pressure variations, leading to non-uniform film thickness and composition, particularly in multi-component films and graded layers.

Innovation Solution

A computer-controlled injection system that allows for real-time adjustment of injector settings during processing, enabling optimized gas flow distribution and composition control across the substrate, allowing for uniform deposition and grading of layers in a single chamber without the need for multiple processing chambers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If multiple processing chambers are used to optimize injector settings for different process steps, then manufacturing precision is improved, but device complexity and loss of time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelayer deposition uniformityVSAvoidnumber of processing chambers
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the injector settings adjustable and reconfigurable during the processing sequence. Instead of fixed injector configurations for different chambers, the system dynamically changes injector parameters (flow rates, timing) within a single chamber to achieve different process optimization goals, thereby eliminating the need for multiple physical chambers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements universality by designing a single processing chamber that can perform multiple process steps with different injector settings. The same chamber serves both as a deposition chamber and an etch chamber, with the injector system being reconfigured between steps, making the chamber multi-functional and eliminating the need for separate specialized chambers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Manufacturing precision

If injector settings are adjusted between process steps, then manufacturing precision is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegas flow uniformityVSAvoidchamber shutdown time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies continuity of useful action by enabling injector settings to be adjusted during the processing sequence without requiring chamber shutdown. The system maintains continuous gas flow and processing conditions while dynamically modifying injector parameters, allowing seamless transitions between process steps and eliminating idle time associated with chamber purging and reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary action by pre-programming the injector adjustment sequence to be executed automatically at the optimal moment during processing. The system anticipates the need for parameter changes and executes them in advance during appropriate process phases, ensuring minimal disruption to the overall manufacturing timeline.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If manual injector tuning is performed in advance, then ease of operation is improved, but manufacturing precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinjector setup simplicityVSAvoidgas flow control accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies feedback by implementing a control system that monitors actual gas flow rates and process conditions, then automatically adjusts injector settings in real-time to maintain desired precision. This closed-loop control compensates for variations in gas supply, temperature, and pressure, ensuring consistent manufacturing precision without requiring complex manual tuning procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical tuning operations with an automated computer-controlled injection system. Instead of manual valve adjustment and physical tuning, the system uses electronic control mechanisms to precisely regulate gas flow, thereby eliminating operator variability and achieving higher precision while maintaining ease of operation through automated execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables precise control over layer deposition, reducing non-uniformities and compositional variations, increasing yield and reducing the number of defective wafers by allowing for optimized settings for each process step and phase, and enabling the deposition of graded layers with varying composition across the film thickness.

Implementation Method 1

In semiconductor device fabrication, a substrate or wafer is subjected to a number of processes in order to deposit or remove a layer from the wafer. Many of these processes involve the injection of gases into a reaction chamber containing the wafer. These gases can include, for example, reactive gases injected to deposit a layer on the substrate.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical Vapour Deposition: Chemical Vapour Deposition

Data Source

PatentUS8088223B2System for control of gas injectors
Publication Date: 2012.01.03 ASM IP HLDG BV
  • US8088223B2 patent drawing
  • US8088223B2 patent drawing
  • US8088223B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A substrate processing system has computer controlled injectors. The computer is configured to adjust a plurality of injectors, such as during deposition of a graded layer, between depositions of two different layers, or between deposition and chamber clean steps.