Computer Infrastructure Power Scheduling for Low-Carbon Energy Use

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The increasing demand for electrical energy and thermal management in computing infrastructures, such as supercomputers, leads to high carbon footprints and inefficiencies in energy consumption, necessitating a method to optimize electrical consumption while minimizing reliance on carbon-based grids.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that utilize local renewable energy sources, thermal regulation, and intelligent task scheduling to minimize grid energy use, incorporating environmental data and task criticality to adjust power consumption and thermal management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If computing infrastructure performs more tasks using computing resources, then computing productivity increases, but electrical energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputing productivityVSAvoidelectrical energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic task scheduling that adjusts computing resource allocation based on real-time electrical energy availability from local sources and grid conditions. The system dynamically determines which tasks to execute, pause, or defer based on current energy constraints, enabling productivity optimization without excessive energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters by adjusting computing resource utilization levels based on energy availability. When local energy sources are sufficient, the system increases computing resource usage to maximize productivity. When energy availability decreases, the system reduces resource usage or pauses non-critical tasks to maintain operational sustainability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If computing infrastructure performs more tasks, then computing productivity increases, but heat dissipation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputing productivityVSAvoidheat dissipation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic thermal management that adjusts task execution based on real-time temperature conditions. The system monitors heat dissipation levels and dynamically determines whether to continue, pause, or defer tasks based on thermal constraints, preventing overheating while maintaining maximum feasible productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from temperature sensors to adjust computing resource allocation and task scheduling. When temperature exceeds thresholds, the system receives feedback and automatically reduces resource usage or pauses tasks to allow cooling, creating a closed-loop thermal management system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If thermal management system operates to maintain optimal temperature, then computing infrastructure reliability increases, but electrical energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputing infrastructure reliabilityVSAvoidelectrical energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic thermal management that adjusts cooling system operation based on real-time temperature conditions and energy availability. The system operates thermal management at minimum necessary levels during low-energy periods and increases cooling capacity when energy is abundant, maintaining reliability while minimizing energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Productivity

If computing infrastructure uses more electrical energy from the grid, then computing productivity increases, but carbon footprint increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputing productivityVSAvoidcarbon footprint
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by capturing and storing electrical energy from local sources (such as on-site generation or energy storage systems) before it would otherwise be unavailable or more expensive. This stored energy is then used to power computing tasks, replacing grid electricity and reducing carbon footprint while maintaining productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system converts the limitation of local energy source capacity into a benefit by using it as a constraint that drives optimization of task scheduling and resource allocation. This constraint forces the system to be more efficient and selective about task execution, ultimately reducing overall energy consumption and carbon footprint while maintaining essential productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Data Source

PatentEP4198686B1Method for optimising the power consumption of a computer infrastructure and associated system
Publication Date: 2025.11.19 BULL SA
  • EP4198686B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4198686B1 patent drawing
  • EP4198686B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for optimizing the electrical consumption of a computer infrastructure (CU) required to execute a set (W) of computing tasks using computing resources (RES), the computer infrastructure (CU) and the computing resources (RES) being powered by an electrical network (GRID) and at least one local electrical energy source (ENR), the method (100) comprising: - the determination (230) of a subset (W') of computing tasks to be scheduled on the plurality of computing resources (RES) as a function of electrical powers deliverable (PDGRID, PDENR) by the electrical network (GRID) and the local electrical energy source (ENR); and - the determination (290) of a parameterization (REP) of the electrical network (GRID) and the local electrical energy source (ENR) to power the computer infrastructure (CU).