Computer System Privacy Threat Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing information handling systems lack effective mechanisms to detect and respond to potential privacy threats, such as unauthorized onlookers or listeners, near the system.

Innovation Solution

The system employs sensors to detect registered users and potential privacy threats, such as non-registered users or devices capturing system output, and adjusts its privacy level by implementing restrictions like locking the system or muting audio.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the system operates at a basic privacy level without threat detection, then the system is simpler and more efficient, but privacy protection is insufficient against unauthorized onlookers or listeners

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprivacy protectionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of potential privacy threats using sensors before unauthorized access or eavesdropping can occur. By continuously monitoring for unauthorized presence and taking preventive actions (locking, muting, suspending applications), the system protects privacy proactively rather than reactively, resolving the contradiction between basic operation and robust privacy protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If the system continuously monitors for privacy threats using multiple sensors, then privacy threat detection is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethreat detection capabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs periodic monitoring of the physical environment using sensors rather than continuous full-system analysis. The privacy level adjusts based on detected conditions, enabling the system to maintain threat detection capability while reducing energy consumption during normal operation by only activating intensive monitoring when necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Reliability

If the system implements multiple privacy restrictions in response to detected threats, then privacy protection is enhanced, but system functionality is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprivacy protectionVSAvoidsystem functionality
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts privacy restrictions based on the detected threat level and context. Rather than implementing maximum restrictions continuously, the system adapts its response (locking, muting, suspending specific applications) to the specific threat detected, maintaining privacy protection while preserving system functionality during normal operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20250190597A1Privacy threat detection
Publication Date: 2025.06.12 DELL PROD LP
  • US20250190597A1 patent drawing
  • US20250190597A1 patent drawing
  • US20250190597A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for identifying potential privacy threats are described. One example method includes identifying a registered user physically located proximate to the computer system based on signals from one or more sensors of the computer system; in response to identifying the registered user, operating the computer system at a first privacy level; identifying a potential privacy threat physically located proximate to the computer system based on the signals from the sensors, wherein the potential privacy threat is separate from the registered user; and in response to identifying the potential privacy threat, operating the computer system at a second privacy level different from the first privacy level.