Concave Turning Insert Geometry for Low-Depth Chip Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing turning inserts face challenges in achieving desirable chip breaking and tool life when cutting metals like low carbon steels at low depths of cut, often requiring smaller nose radii, higher feeds, or expensive coolant systems, which compromise surface finish or insert longevity.

Innovation Solution

A turning insert design featuring cutting edges that subtend an angle of 75-85°, with a concave corner cutting edge and a depression on the top surface, improving chip control and reducing flank wear by smoothing transitions and enhancing chip breaking capabilities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Shape

If a smaller nose radius is chosen to improve chip breaking at low depth of cut, then chip shape is improved, but the life of the turning insert decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechip shapeVSAvoidinsert life
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies local quality by creating a depression specifically at the corner cutting edge region while maintaining the rest of the insert geometry. This localized modification improves chip breaking at low depth of cut without requiring a smaller nose radius, thereby preserving insert life while achieving desirable chip shape.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The depression is pre-formed on the insert before machining begins. This preliminary structural modification prepares the chip flow path in advance, enabling effective chip breaking at low depth of cut conditions without needing to change the nose radius or apply other modifications during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Shape

If a higher feed is chosen to improve chip breaking, then chip shape is improved, but the machined surface finish is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechip shapeVSAvoidsurface finish
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The depression is localized specifically at the corner cutting edge area, creating a chip breaking zone that does not interfere with the surface generation by the main cutting edge. This allows higher feed rates to be used for improved chip breaking while maintaining good surface finish on the machined workpiece.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Shape

If high pressure coolant is used to break chips, then chip breaking is improved, but expensive investments are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechip shapeVSAvoidcoolant system cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The depression structure on the insert itself performs the chip breaking function without requiring external high-pressure coolant systems. The geometric feature creates chip curling and breaking through its own structure, making the chip breaking capability inherent to the tool rather than dependent on expensive auxiliary systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Shape

If the first surface is extended to improve chip breaking, then chip shape is improved, but the transition points may create stress concentrations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechip shapeVSAvoidinsert strength
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The depression is designed with curved surfaces and smooth transitions rather than sharp angles. This curvature eliminates stress concentration points that would otherwise form at sharp transitions, maintaining insert strength while still achieving effective chip breaking through the extended first surface geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Data Source

PatentEP3260225B1Turning insert
Publication Date: 2022.11.30 SANDVIK INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AB
  • EP3260225B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3
  • EP3260225B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5
  • EP3260225B1 patent drawingFigure 6~7

AI summary

A turning insert (1) comprising a top surface (2), an opposite bottom surface (3), a side surface (4) connecting the top and bottom surfaces (2, 3), a cutting edge (15) formed at an intersection between the top surface (2) and the side surface (4). The cutting edge (15) comprising a corner cutting edge (5), a first cutting edge (6) and a second cutting edge (7). The top surface (2) comprises a first surface (13) in the form of a depression, which borders to at least a major portion of the corner cutting edge (5). The first and the second cutting edges (6, 7) subtend an angle θ which is 75 - 85°. At least a part of the corner cutting edge (5) is concave in a front view.