Concave O-Ring Gland for High-Pressure Sealing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

High-pressure spray nozzle assemblies in industrial applications, such as spray drying, face challenges in designing effective and reliable static sealing arrangements due to high-pressure operation, constrained geometry, and the need for frequent maintenance, with existing resources like the Parker O-Ring Handbook providing limited guidance on these specific challenges.

Innovation Solution

A static axial sealing arrangement featuring a concavely curved sidewall with a projecting lip to locate and retain an O-ring, reducing local stress concentrations and facilitating ergonomic handling and cleaning, implemented between the nozzle cap and body, and a tungsten carbide orifice disc, using a high-strength but brittle material, and fabricated from food-grade steel like 316 grade steel.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a traditional flat-sided sealing gland is used, then the structure is simple and easy to manufacture, but the O-ring cannot be effectively retained during disassembly and stress concentrations occur at sharp corners

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing reliabilityVSAvoidgland structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies curvature by replacing the traditional flat-sided gland with a concavely curved sidewall profile. This curved geometry serves multiple functions: it eliminates sharp corners that cause stress concentrations, creates a self-retaining profile that prevents O-ring dislodgement during assembly and disassembly, and maintains structural simplicity. The concave curvature naturally guides and retains the O-ring through interference fit without requiring additional retention features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

2Reliability

If high-pressure sealing is achieved through tight tolerances, then sealing effectiveness improves, but manufacturing complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing effectivenessVSAvoidtolerance requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the geometric parameters of the sealing gland from a traditional rectangular profile to a concavely curved profile. This parameter change allows the design to achieve effective sealing through the curved interference fit geometry rather than relying solely on tight dimensional tolerances. The concave curvature creates a natural retention mechanism that maintains sealing effectiveness across a broader tolerance range.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If conventional sealing arrangements are used, then the design is straightforward, but frequent disassembly leads to O-ring loss and contamination risk

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance convenienceVSAvoidcontamination prevention
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The concavely curved sidewall profile creates a self-retaining geometry that prevents the O-ring from falling out or becoming contaminated during routine disassembly and reassembly operations. The curved profile naturally guides the O-ring into place and holds it securely, eliminating the need for additional retention features while preventing contamination risks associated with loose O-rings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

4Ease of manufacture

If sharp-cornered gland profiles are used, then manufacturing is simpler, but stress concentrations lead to premature failure in brittle materials

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachining simplicityVSAvoidresistance to stress concentration
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces sharp corners with concavely curved sidewalls, which eliminate stress concentration points that would otherwise lead to premature failure in brittle materials like tungsten carbide. The curved profile distributes stresses more uniformly throughout the gland structure, significantly improving durability while remaining compatible with standard CNC machining processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enhances sealing efficiency, reduces the risk of premature failure from stress concentrations, and meets engineering standards for high-pressure operations by distributing sealing pressure over a greater area and allowing for easy O-ring removal and replacement, ensuring safety and reliability in high-pressure environments.

Implementation Method 1

The concavely curved profile of the sidewalls advantageously acts to reduce local stress concentrations when a sealing arrangement is pressurised, and can in some designs provide a greater area over which sealing occurs.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectStress distribution:

Implementation Method 2

The O-ring is located and retained under slight tension at the inner sidewall, or alternatively under slight compression against the outer sidewall.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS10875046B2High-pressure sealing of spray nozzle assemblies
Publication Date: 2020.12.29 SPRAY NOZZLE ENG
  • US10875046B2 patent drawing
  • US10875046B2 patent drawing
  • US10875046B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A static axial seal gland (100, 100) formed in relief in a substrate (31, 52) and having an inner sidewall (32, 53), an outer sidewall (33, 54) and a floor (34, 55) extending between the inner sidewall (32, 53) and the outer sidewall, one or both of the inner sidewall (32, 53) and the outer sidewall (32, 53) being concavely-profiled in radial section along a major portion of its depth to define a projecting lip (35, 56) proximal a land of the substrate (31, 52), the gland (100, 100′) being fitted with an elastomeric O-ring (39, 59) which is located and retained by interference with the projecting lip (35, 56), either under tension on the inner sidewall (32, 53) or in compression against the outer sidewall (33, 54).