Concealed Door Handle Assembly with Lockable Push-Push Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional vehicle door handle assemblies compromise aesthetic appeal and security, as they protrude from the vehicle's surface, making them vulnerable to unauthorized access and theft, while also being redundant with the advent of electronic door operation systems, necessitating a solution that maintains aesthetics, enhances security, and provides a reliable mechanical failsafe.

Innovation Solution

A concealed door handle assembly that integrates a door handle flush with the vehicle's surface, transitioning between concealed and operational states, featuring a lockable push-push mechanism for selective accessibility, and operable with both mechanical and electronic systems, eliminating redundant components and providing a secure, aesthetically pleasing means of access.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a conventional protruding door handle assembly is used, then the door can be easily opened, but the aesthetic appeal is compromised and security is reduced due to vulnerability to unauthorized access

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of door openingVSAvoidaesthetic appeal
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The door handle assembly is designed to dynamically change its position between a retracted state (flush with door surface for aesthetics and security) and a deployed state (protruding for operation). The handle moves from a first position recessed in the door to a second position protruding from the door, allowing it to adapt between aesthetic/security requirements and operational requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If a conventional protruding door handle assembly is used, then the door can be easily opened, but security is compromised due to vulnerability to unauthorized access and theft

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of door openingVSAvoidvulnerability to unauthorized access
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The handle's dynamic positioning between retracted and deployed states allows it to remain hidden during parked periods, reducing visibility to potential thieves, while being readily accessible when needed for legitimate door opening operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The handle assembly is nested within a recess in the door surface when not in use, with the handle contained within the door thickness. This nesting approach hides the handle from external view and access, thereby improving security while maintaining ease of operation when deployed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Shape

If electronic door operation systems are used, then aesthetic appeal is improved, but reliability is reduced due to potential electronic failures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaesthetic appealVSAvoidreliability of door operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The door handle assembly serves multiple functions: it provides aesthetic appearance when retracted, enables manual door opening when deployed, and can interface with electronic door locking systems. This multi-functionality allows the same mechanical component to support both aesthetic requirements and reliable mechanical operation as a failsafe.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanical handle assembly serves as a pre-prepared backup system that can take over if electronic systems fail. By maintaining a functional mechanical handle that can independently operate the door, the system cushions against the harmful effect of electronic failures before they become critical problems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

4Shape

If a concealed door handle assembly is used, then aesthetic appeal and security are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaesthetic appealVSAvoidcomplexity of handle assembly
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The dynamic movement mechanism allows the handle to transition between retracted and deployed positions, providing aesthetic and security benefits when retracted while maintaining operational capability when deployed. This dynamic approach achieves the desired aesthetic improvement without requiring permanently complex concealed mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20240337140A1Concealed Door Handle Assembly
Publication Date: 2024.10.10 ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC
  • US20240337140A1 patent drawing
  • US20240337140A1 patent drawing
  • US20240337140A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a concealed door handle assembly (100). The concealed door handle assembly (100) includes a housing (106), a door lock access (200), a lockable push-push mechanism (108) and a door operation assembly (300). The door lock access is mounted on the housing (106) and is selectively accessible. The lockable push-push mechanism (108) is operably mounted on the housing (106). A door operation assembly (300) operably mounted on the housing (106) comprises, a locking mechanism in an operable connection with the door lock access (200) to initiate locking action, a latching mechanism to initiate a latching action. The door handle (104) pivotably connected to the housing (106) about a door handle axis parallel to a plane of the housing (106) for the door handle (104) to conceal access to the door lock access.