Concentric Box Plastic Restraint Locking Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Plastic restraint devices are prone to damage when used on strong individuals due to weaknesses in their locking mechanisms, making them unreliable for secure restraint.

Innovation Solution

A plastic restraint device constructed from three integral sub-assemblies of single-piece plastic components, featuring a concentric box-within-a-box design with sloped teeth that distribute stress and prevent removal, enhancing strength and security.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If plastic restraint devices use conventional locking mechanisms, then they are easier to manufacture and less expensive, but they are prone to damage when used on strong individuals

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestrength of locking mechanismVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The restraint device is divided into three integral sub-assemblies (first strap assembly, second strap assembly, and handle), each constructed from a single piece of plastic. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized for its specific function while maintaining manufacturing simplicity through injection molding of individual parts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a concentric box-within-a-box design where the second box structure is nested inside the first box structure. This nested configuration distributes stress across multiple concentric layers, significantly enhancing the strength and resistance to damage of the locking mechanism while remaining manufacturable through standard plastic injection molding processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Reliability

If plastic restraint devices use conventional locking mechanisms, then the device complexity is lower, but the reliability is reduced due to common failure points

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of restraint deviceVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The concentric box-within-a-box design eliminates common failure points by distributing stress across multiple nested structures. The inner box is surrounded by an outer box, creating redundant load paths that prevent single-point failures and significantly improve reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

Each sub-assembly is constructed as an integral unit combining multiple functions into single components. The box structures integrate locking, restraining, and stress-distribution functions, reducing the number of separate parts and potential failure points while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Strength

If metal handcuffs are used to ensure robustness and tamper resistance, then strength and security are improved, but manufacturing cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverobustness of restraint deviceVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material parameter from metal to plastic, specifically using high-strength plastic materials that can be molded into complex shapes. This parameter change maintains the necessary strength and robustness while dramatically reducing manufacturing cost and complexity compared to metal construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The device uses plastic as a composite material solution, leveraging modern high-strength plastic formulations that combine durability, flexibility, and cost-effectiveness. This composite approach replaces traditional metal construction while achieving comparable or superior performance for restraint applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS9194161B2Integrated plastic restraint
Publication Date: 2015.11.24 ARMAMENT SYSTEMS & PROCEDURES INC
  • US9194161B2 patent drawing
  • US9194161B2 patent drawing
  • US9194161B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus includes an elongated peg and box tube, the peg and box tube are coaxially aligned along a longitudinal axis of the respective peg and are concentric, first and second apertures extending through the peg and box tube, first and second respective arms within the peg each with a plurality of teeth from an exterior wall towards a second, opposing side of the peg directly adjacent one of the first and second apertures and a strap extending from each of the peg and box tube and from opposing longitudinal ends, wherein each of the straps has a plurality of notches extending perpendicular to a longitudinal axis of the strap, where each of the plurality of teeth of the respective arms engages one of the plurality of notches of a respective strap inserted through a corresponding one of the first and second apertures.