Concentric Shaft Transfer Apparatus for Semiconductor Substrates

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional wafer transfer systems in semiconductor processing are inadequate for efficiently handling substrates in cluster tool environments, leading to reduced throughput due to inefficient transfer speeds and potential thermal non-uniformity and particle contamination.

Innovation Solution

A transfer apparatus with a central hub and concentric shafts, featuring independently rotatable arms and aligners, allows for simultaneous or individual transfer of substrates between multiple supports within a transfer region, enabling faster and more precise substrate handling while maintaining a vacuum environment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If conventional wafer transfer systems are used, then the system structure is simple, but the substrate transfer speed is slow and throughput is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubstrate transfer speedVSAvoidtransfer system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The transfer system is segmented into multiple independent arms (first arm, second arm, third arm, fourth arm) that can operate simultaneously to transfer different substrates. Each arm is independently controllable, allowing parallel operations that increase overall transfer speed without requiring a complete system redesign

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple arms are merged into a single integrated transfer system sharing common support structures and control mechanisms. The arms share common shafts and mounting structures, reducing overall system complexity while enabling simultaneous substrate transfers through coordinated arm movements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Loss of time

If conventional transfer systems are used, then the device complexity is low, but the queue time between processing chambers increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequeue timeVSAvoidtransfer apparatus complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The multiple arms are configured to perform continuous substrate transfer operations without idle waiting periods. While one arm transfers a substrate from chamber A to chamber B, other arms simultaneously perform transfers between different chamber pairs, eliminating queue times and maintaining continuous productive action across all transfer operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The arms are designed with dynamic positioning capabilities, allowing them to move between different transfer positions and adjust their motion paths based on real-time processing requirements. This dynamic flexibility enables optimal transfer routing that minimizes queue times while adapting to varying production demands

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Object-affected harmful factors

If conventional transfer systems are used, then the system is simple to operate, but thermal non-uniformity and particle contamination occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethermal non-uniformity and contaminationVSAvoidtransfer system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The arms are designed to maintain consistent positioning accuracy and transfer heights across all transfer locations. By ensuring that all arms operate at equivalent positional precision and maintain uniform distances from substrate processing surfaces, thermal non-uniformity is minimized while particle contamination is reduced through consistent, controlled transfer paths

Inventive Principle:
Principle #12Equipotentiality

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual or simple mechanical transfer mechanisms with automated, precisely controlled arm movements. This substitution enables more accurate and repeatable transfer operations that reduce variability in thermal exposure and minimize the risk of particle generation compared to conventional mechanical transfer systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11355367B2Robot for simultaneous substrate transfer
Publication Date: 2022.06.07 APPLIED MATERIALS INC
  • US11355367B2 patent drawing
  • US11355367B2 patent drawing
  • US11355367B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Exemplary substrate processing systems may include a transfer region housing defining a transfer region, and including substrate supports and a transfer apparatus. The transfer apparatus may include a central hub having a housing, and including a first shaft and a second shaft. The housing may be coupled with the second shaft, and may define an internal housing volume. The transfer apparatus may include a plurality of arms equal to a number of substrate supports of the plurality of substrate supports. Each arm of the plurality of arms may be coupled about an exterior of the housing. The transfer apparatus may include a plurality of arm hubs disposed within the internal housing volume. Each arm hub of the plurality of arm hubs may be coupled with an arm of the plurality of arms through the housing. The arm hubs may be coupled with the first shaft of the central hub.