Concentric Shell Helmet With Deforming Impact Structures

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current helmets are effective in preventing skull fractures but leave wearers vulnerable to concussions due to insufficient energy absorption from collisions, particularly in sports and activities that involve rapid changes in skull velocity relative to the brain.

Innovation Solution

A helmet design featuring two concentric shells with impact-absorbing structures between them, which deform under strong impact forces to reduce energy transmission to the wearer's skull, and modular rows that simplify manufacturing and allow for independent movement of the shells to mitigate rotational acceleration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If traditional single-shell helmet design is used, then skull fracture prevention is achieved, but concussion protection is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveskull fracture preventionVSAvoidimpact energy absorption
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The helmet is divided into two concentric shells with impact-absorbing structures positioned between them. The outer shell distributes impact forces over a wider area, while the inner shell provides rigid protection. The segmented structure allows independent optimization of each shell's function - the outer shell for force distribution and the inner shell for skull protection - while the impact-absorbing structures between them provide dedicated energy dissipation capability to prevent concussions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Strength

If rigid shell is used, then skull fracture protection is improved, but impact force transmission to brain increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveskull protectionVSAvoidimpact force transmission
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

Impact-absorbing structures serve as intermediary elements positioned between the outer shell and inner shell. These structures receive distributed impact forces from the outer shell and transform them through deformation (buckling, crushing) before transmitting reduced forces to the inner shell. This intermediary layer prevents direct force transmission from the outer shell to the wearer's skull and brain, thereby reducing concussion risk while maintaining skull protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Loss of energy

If impact absorbing structures are added between concentric shells, then concussion protection is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact energy absorptionVSAvoidhelmet structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The impact-absorbing structures are positioned at specific locations between the concentric shells where impact forces are most likely to occur. Rather than making the entire helmet structure complex, the design concentrates energy-absorbing elements in strategic positions. The outer shell maintains a simple rounded shape for force distribution, while the inner shell remains relatively simple for skull protection, with complexity localized to the impact-absorbing structures between them.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Area of stationary object

If outer shell is made flexible to deform locally, then impact force distribution is improved, but energy absorption capacity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact force distribution areaVSAvoidimpact energy dissipation
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The design merges two distinct mechanisms into a unified system: the flexible outer shell provides force distribution over a wider area, while the impact-absorbing structures between the shells provide dedicated energy dissipation through controlled deformation. By combining these two functions in separate components rather than relying on a single mechanism, the helmet achieves both broad force distribution and sufficient energy absorption capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design reduces the incidence and severity of concussions by effectively absorbing and dissipating impact forces, thereby enhancing head protection beyond traditional helmet capabilities.

Implementation Method 1

the impact absorbing structures undergo deformation (e.g., buckling) when subjected to forces from a sufficiently strong impact force. As a result of the deformation, the impact absorbing structures reduce energy transmitted from the outer shell to the inner shell

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDeformation: Deformation

Implementation Method 2

the impact absorbing structures reduce energy transmitted from the outer shell to the inner shell, thereby reducing forces on the wearer's skull and brain

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnergy absorption: Absorption (physical)

Implementation Method 3

the outer shell may also somewhat rigid to spread impact forces over a wider area of the impact absorbing structures positioned inside the outer shell

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForce distribution: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS10342283B2Manufacturing impact absorbing structures for an athletic helmet
Publication Date: 2019.07.09 VICIS IP LLC
  • US10342283B2 patent drawing
  • US10342283B2 patent drawing
  • US10342283B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A garment worn by a wearer has an exterior shell and an interior shell with various impact absorbing material between the exterior shell and the interior shell. The impact absorbing material includes multiple structures, such as rods or filaments, capable of deforming when force is applied then returning to its state prior to application of the force. In various embodiments, the impact absorbing material is manufactured using injection molding to allow positioning of various structures in the impact absorbing material relative to each other during manufacture. During manufacturing, one or more living hinges are included in portions of the impact absorbing material to allow certain portions of the impact absorbing material to be accurately positioned relative to each other. Other manufacturing methods may be used, such as three-dimensional printing may be used to include structures in the impact absorbing material.