Document Summarization via Concept-Aware Graph Ranking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing automatic summarization methods struggle to generate concise and accurate summaries that capture important information from documents, particularly in handling ambiguous terms and semantic relationships between sentences.

Innovation Solution

A system that utilizes a concept detection unit to identify semantic concepts in sentences, computes relevance measures, and constructs a concept-aware graph to rank sentences, ensuring that only important and diverse information is included in the summary.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional automatic summarization methods are used, then the summarization process is simple and fast, but the accuracy and quality of the generated summaries are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesummary accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The summarization process is divided into multiple independent modules: concept detection unit, relevance computation unit, graph construction unit, and ranking unit. Each module handles a specific aspect of the summarization task, allowing for improved accuracy through specialized processing while maintaining manageable system complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A concept-aware graph is introduced as an intermediary structure that connects sentences through detected concepts and computed relevance measures. This graph serves as a mediator that organizes semantic relationships between sentences, enabling more accurate summary generation by prioritizing sentences based on their relevance to detected concepts rather than using simple extraction methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of information

If more sentences are included in the summary to capture important information, then the completeness of information is improved, but the conciseness of the summary deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completenessVSAvoidsummary length
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system computes relevance measures between sentences and detected concepts, then uses this feedback to rank sentences. The ranking mechanism provides feedback on which sentences most effectively convey important information, allowing the system to select a optimal subset of sentences that maximizes information completeness while maintaining conciseness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of sentence selection from simple count-based or position-based selection to relevance-based ranking. By transforming the selection criterion into a relevance measure parameter that quantifies the importance of each sentence relative to detected concepts, the system can optimize the balance between information completeness and summary length.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If simple extraction methods are used for summarization, then the processing speed is fast and device complexity is low, but the ability to handle ambiguous terms and semantic relationships is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesemantic relationship handlingVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary concept detection on the document before generating the summary. By identifying key concepts and their relationships in advance, the system creates a semantic framework that guides the subsequent sentence selection and ranking process, enabling better handling of ambiguous terms and semantic relationships without excessive processing complexity during summary generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS9727556B2Summarization of a document
Publication Date: 2017.08.08 MICRO FOCUS LLC
  • US9727556B2 patent drawing
  • US9727556B2 patent drawing
  • US9727556B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for summarizing a document is provided. A concept is detected for each sentence in said document. Relevance measures between the sentences are computed according to the detected concepts. And then a concept-aware graph is constructed, wherein a node in said graph represents a sentence in the document and an edge between two nodes represents a relevance measure between these two sentences.