Concept-Based Search Classification for Abstract Natural Language Discourse

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current keyword-based search methods are inadequate for retrieving records that express or utilize high-level, abstract concepts, as they rely on specific keywords that are difficult to define, leading to large and irrelevant search results, and popularity metrics do not accurately represent the relevance of search topics like new uses of technologies or technologies addressing specific problems.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of concept-based search and classification techniques that analyze natural language discourse to identify and rank records based on pinnacle concepts, using a two-phase approach combining keyword-based and concept-based searching, where concept-based databases are created during the indexing phase and used in conjunction with keyword-based searching to improve relevance and efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If keyword-based search is used, then search coverage is improved, but search precision deteriorates due to large and irrelevant result sets

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch coverageVSAvoidsearch precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the search process into two distinct phases: keyword-based search to retrieve candidate records and concept-based classification to filter and rank them. This segmentation allows the system to first cast a wide net with keywords (maintaining coverage) then apply precise conceptual filtering (improving precision), resolving the contradiction between comprehensive search coverage and accurate result retrieval.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces concept-based classification as an intermediary mechanism between keyword search and final result presentation. This intermediary layer analyzes linguistic features and contextual relationships to bridge the gap between simple keyword matching and meaningful concept understanding, thereby improving search precision without sacrificing the broad coverage achieved through keyword-based retrieval.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If specific keywords are used, then search precision is improved, but search coverage deteriorates due to inability to capture abstract concepts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch precisionVSAvoidsearch coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent adds a new dimension to search by transitioning from one-dimensional keyword matching to multi-dimensional concept analysis. By incorporating linguistic feature analysis, contextual relationships, and semantic understanding, the system captures abstract concepts that cannot be expressed through specific keywords alone, thereby expanding search coverage while maintaining precision through concept-based filtering.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the search parameters from simple keyword presence/absence to complex conceptual attributes including linguistic features, contextual relationships, and semantic meanings. This parameter transformation enables the system to identify records expressing abstract concepts like 'new uses of technology' or 'technologies addressing problems' without relying on specific keywords, thus improving coverage while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If popularity metric is used for ranking, then ease of operation is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates for concept-based search topics

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveranking simplicityVSAvoidrelevance accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the ranking parameter from popularity-based metrics to concept-based relevance scoring. By analyzing whether records actually express or utilize the target concepts through linguistic feature examination and contextual analysis, the system achieves precise relevance ranking for concept-based search topics, replacing the simplistic popularity metric with a nuanced conceptual relevance measure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11334573B1Method and apparatus for concept-based classification of natural language discourse
Publication Date: 2022.05.17 NETBASE SOLUTIONS INC
  • US11334573B1 patent drawing
  • US11334573B1 patent drawing
  • US11334573B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Pinnacle concepts are not amenable to detection by the use of keywords. A unit of natural language discourse (UNLD) “refers” to a pinnacle concept “C” when that UNLD uses linguistic expressions in such a way that “C” is regarded as expressed, used or invoked by an ordinary reader of “L.” A reference can have a “reference level” value that is proportional to: the “strength” with which the pinnacle concept is referenced, the probability that a pinnacle concept is referenced or both strength and probability. Pinnacle concepts can be divided into Quantifiers and non-Quantifiers. A Quantifier can modify the reference level assigned to a non-Quantifier. A concept “C,” that is determined to be referenced by a UNLD “x,” after application of its Quantifiers, is said to be asserted by “x.” Concept-based classification is the identification of whether a pinnacle concept “C” is asserted by a UNLD. Concept-based classification can be used for concept-based search.