Concept Extraction Denoising via Vector Embedding Similarity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional cognitive question answering (QA) systems face challenges in identifying and processing concepts due to noisy annotation algorithms that rely solely on surface-level word sequences without contextual understanding, leading to inefficient concept extraction and annotation errors.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that utilize vector embedding methods to represent concepts as vectors, allowing for the comparison of extracted concept sequences against reference or anchor concepts to evaluate similarity and identify potential errors or outliers, thereby improving the coherence and accuracy of concept annotations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional annotation algorithms are used to extract concepts based on surface-level word sequences, then the process is simple and fast, but the accuracy and reliability of concept extraction deteriorates due to noisy annotations and lack of contextual understanding

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconcept extraction speedVSAvoidconcept extraction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces vector representations as an intermediary between surface-level word sequences and concept annotations. Instead of directly mapping words to concepts using simple algorithms, the system transforms words into vector embeddings that capture semantic relationships, then uses these vectors to compute similarity with reference concepts. This intermediary representation enables contextual understanding while maintaining computational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter representation from discrete surface forms (words) to continuous vector embeddings. By transforming the input representation into a different parameter space where semantic similarity is captured through vector distance metrics, the system achieves both accuracy and efficiency. The vector space allows for nuanced comparisons that go beyond exact word matching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If supervised learning procedures are used to train classifiers for concept discrimination, then the system can distinguish between promising and unpromising annotations, but the complexity of the system increases and the process becomes slower

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveannotation discrimination accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses pre-trained vector embeddings that capture linguistic knowledge without requiring domain-specific training data. Instead of training custom classifiers for each domain, the system copies proven vector representation techniques from natural language processing research and adapts them to concept extraction. This approach achieves high accuracy without the complexity of domain-specific supervised learning pipelines.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The vector embedding approach serves multiple functions simultaneously: it captures semantic meaning, enables similarity computation, and provides a unified representation for both words and concepts. This universal representation eliminates the need for separate processing pipelines for different annotation tasks, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining discrimination accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If annotation algorithms process concepts without contextualized understanding, then the processing is efficient and fast, but the reliability of identified concepts deteriorates due to inability to identify outliers and errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveannotation processing speedVSAvoidconcept identification reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where extracted concepts are compared against reference concepts using vector similarity metrics. The similarity scores provide feedback on the quality of extracted annotations, enabling the system to identify outliers and potential errors. Concepts with unusually low similarity scores can be flagged for review or correction, improving overall reliability while maintaining processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10831762B2Extracting and denoising concept mentions using distributed representations of concepts
Publication Date: 2020.11.10 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US10831762B2 patent drawing
  • US10831762B2 patent drawing
  • US10831762B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus are provided for automatically analyzing candidate concepts extracted from a first source text against a reference concept set comprising a plurality of concepts by obtaining a vector representation for each of the concepts in the first concept set and the reference concept set and performing a natural language processing (NLP) analysis comparison of the candidate concepts to the reference concept set to determine a similarity measure corresponding to each candidate concept and validating one or more of the candidate concepts based on the similarity measure for each candidate concept meeting a minimum similarity threshold requirement.