Concordance Visualization for Multi-Modality Medical Imaging Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for analyzing medical imaging results from different modalities, such as anatomical and functional imaging, require advanced post-processing workstations and are hindered by the need for all exams to be in one location, making it difficult for clinicians to determine concordance levels effectively.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that generate a concordance visualization by providing result lists of anatomical structures with severity indicators from different imaging exams and a relationship matrix, allowing for the analysis and display of concordance levels between these structures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If advanced post-processing workstations are used to analyze medical imaging results from different modalities, then the concordance determination accuracy is improved, but the device cost and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconcordance determination accuracyVSAvoidworkstation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the concordance analysis process into distinct functional modules: data acquisition from multiple imaging modalities, image registration to align anatomical structures, automated feature extraction and comparison, and concordance determination. This modular approach enables accurate multi-modality analysis without requiring a single complex workstation, as each module can be implemented independently using standard computing devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary computational framework that processes and integrates data from different imaging modalities. This framework includes automated algorithms for image registration, feature matching, and concordance calculation that mediate between the raw imaging data and the final clinical interpretation, reducing the need for complex manual analysis workstations while maintaining high accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of information

If all imaging exams are centralized in one location for analysis, then the data availability for concordance analysis is improved, but the operational flexibility and ease of use deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata availabilityVSAvoidoperational flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal data exchange framework that enables concordance analysis across distributed imaging centers. The system uses standardized data formats and protocols that allow imaging data from different modalities and locations to be integrated and analyzed together, eliminating the need for physical centralization while maintaining full data availability and operational flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements automated data collection and integration capabilities that actively retrieve imaging data from multiple sources without requiring manual data transfer or centralized storage. The automated workflows include self-service features for data acquisition, validation, and preparation, enabling the system to operate flexibly across distributed locations while ensuring all necessary data is available for concordance analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If manual comparison of imaging results is performed by clinicians, then the diagnostic experience and knowledge utilization are improved, but the time consumption and productivity decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic reliabilityVSAvoidanalysis speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a hybrid feedback system where automated concordance analysis provides initial results and confidence scores, which are then presented to clinicians for verification and final interpretation. The system learns from clinician feedback to refine its automated analysis algorithms, creating a continuous improvement loop that maintains high diagnostic reliability while significantly reducing the time required for manual comparison.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs partial automation by automatically handling the computationally intensive tasks of image registration, feature extraction, and initial concordance assessment, while leaving the final interpretive judgment to clinicians. This partial action approach leverages automated processing for speed while preserving clinical expertise for reliability, achieving both productivity and diagnostic quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11051780B2Automatically generating synchronized view and level of concordance of diagnostic exams
Publication Date: 2021.07.06 SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG
  • US11051780B2 patent drawing
  • US11051780B2 patent drawing
  • US11051780B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An embodiment of a method includes providing a first result list indicating a plurality of first anatomic structures and indicating, for each respective first anatomic structure of the plurality of first anatomic structures, a corresponding first severity indicator; providing a second result list indicating, for each respective second anatomic structure of the plurality of the second anatomic structures, a corresponding second severity indicator; providing a relationship matrix indicating a level of interrelatedness between the first anatomic structures and the second anatomic structures; and generating, based on the first result list provided, on the second result list and on the relationship matrix provided, a concordance visualization indicating a respective level of concordance between at least one of the first anatomic structures and the corresponding first severity indicator, and indicating a respective level of concordance between at least one of the second anatomic structures and the corresponding second severity indicator.