Concrete Barrier Coupling Design for Impact Load Distribution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Concrete barriers in road construction face challenges with high loads and moments at the transition point between stationary and mobile guide wall elements during vehicle impacts, leading to potential damage and increased manufacturing complexity due to the use of sleeve shoes for force absorption.

Innovation Solution

A concrete barrier design featuring a stationary first guide wall element and a mobile second guide wall element connected via couplings with a first length greater than a second length, where rib-shaped webs on the rear side of the couplings protrude into the concrete body, distributing impact forces and using pressure plates to reduce local stress, and incorporating anchoring elements for added stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If sheathing shoes are used to absorb forces at the transition point between stationary and mobile barrier elements, then the barrier can withstand high impact loads, but the manufacturing complexity and production effort increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact load resistanceVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the force-absorbing function from separate sheathing shoes and integrates it directly into the barrier wall elements themselves. The recesses and coupling elements are built into the concrete elements during casting, eliminating the need for additional attachment components while maintaining the ability to withstand impact loads through controlled deformation zones

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention merges multiple functions into the concrete barrier elements: the structural body, the force-absorbing mechanism (through recesses and coupling geometry), and the connection system are all integrated into single monolithic elements. This consolidation eliminates separate sheathing shoes and reduces manufacturing steps while preserving impact resistance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Loss of energy

If the first barrier wall element is made stationary and the second is mobile, then the barrier can dissipate impact energy through controlled movement, but high forces and moments occur at the connection point

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact energy dissipationVSAvoidconnection force
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The invention segments the connection system into multiple coupling elements distributed along the end surfaces of the barrier elements. Instead of a single concentrated connection point, multiple coupling points share the impact forces and moments, reducing the peak load at any individual connection while maintaining overall structural integrity and energy dissipation capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention creates different local properties within the barrier elements: the recesses provide localized deformation zones for energy absorption, while the coupling elements provide localized force transfer paths. The asymmetric coupling design (first coupling longer than second coupling) creates different stiffness characteristics at different locations to optimize force distribution during impact

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple couplings with different lengths are used to connect barrier elements, then the connection can accommodate movement and distribute forces, but the manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemovement accommodationVSAvoidcoupling alignment precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention uses asymmetric coupling lengths (first coupling longer than second coupling) to create inherent alignment guidance and tolerance compensation. The longer coupling acts as a guide that facilitates proper positioning during assembly, while the shorter coupling provides the necessary movement accommodation. This asymmetric design reduces the precision requirements compared to symmetric multi-coupling systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Data Source

PatentEP3502350B1Concrete safety barrier
Publication Date: 2021.03.17 STRABAG SE
  • EP3502350B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3502350B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP3502350B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

In a connection (2) of two guide wall elements (1f, 1m) of a concrete guide wall with a stationary, preferably cast-in-place concrete, first guide wall element (1f) having a base surface (5), an end surface (4) and side surfaces (7, 11), and with a mobile second guide wall element (1m) preferably aligned longitudinally therewith, having a base surface (5), an end surface (4) facing the end surface (4) of the first guide wall element (1f), and side surfaces (7, 11), the first guide wall element (1f) and the second guide wall element (1m) are connected to each other at their end surfaces (4) via a first positive-locking coupling (16). The first guide wall element (1f) and the second guide wall element (1m) are connected to each other via at least one second positive-locking coupling (18) horizontally spaced from the first positive-locking coupling (16).