Concrete Cylinder Mold Cutter Leverage Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The current method for removing concrete test specimens from plastic molds, involving hammer strikes and chisel points, is hazardous for operators and often damages specimens due to inadequate support.

Innovation Solution

A manual, tabletop or pedestal-mounted concrete cylinder mold cutting apparatus with mechanical linkage provides leverage to safely and efficiently cut plastic molds without scoring or damaging the concrete specimens, allowing for simultaneous cutting on both sides.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If hammer or rubber mallet strikes are used to cut the plastic mold, then the mold can be cut and specimen removed, but operator safety is compromised and specimens may be damaged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemold stripping efficiencyVSAvoidoperator injury risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual hammer-striking mechanical system with a mechanically-linked lever system that provides controlled cutting motion. The lever arm pivots to drive the cutting tool through the mold with mechanical advantage, eliminating the need for repeated hammer strikes and reducing operator exposure to harmful impacts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a cutting tool as an intermediary between the lever mechanism and the plastic mold. This cutting tool directly engages the mold material, providing a controlled cutting action that separates the specimen from the mold without requiring direct operator contact with hammer or mold surfaces

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If hammer strikes are used to cut the plastic mold, then the mold can be cut, but specimen integrity is compromised due to inadequate support

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemold stripping efficiencyVSAvoidspecimen integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent positions the cutting tool to engage the mold at the separation line before the cutting action begins. The lever mechanism is configured so that the cutting edge contacts the mold at the predetermined separation point, ensuring clean separation without lateral forces that could damage the specimen

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The controlled mechanical linkage provides steady, directional cutting force that replaces the uncontrolled impact forces of hammer striking. This substitution ensures that cutting forces are applied only at the mold-specimen interface, preventing transmission of damaging forces to the specimen itself

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If numerous hammer strikes are required to cut the mold, then cutting can be achieved, but time consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemold stripping efficiencyVSAvoidstripping time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the cutting action into a single continuous lever motion that cuts through the entire mold thickness in one stroke. The mechanical linkage translates lever arm movement into sustained cutting force, eliminating the need for multiple separate hammer strikes and significantly reducing stripping time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a dynamic lever mechanism that provides mechanical advantage throughout the cutting stroke. The pivoting lever arm maintains optimal cutting force application, allowing the operator to cut through the mold efficiently in a single motion rather than requiring multiple static hammer strikes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The apparatus enables safe, timely, and cost-effective removal of large quantities of concrete test specimens, reducing operator injuries and specimen damage while maintaining specimen integrity.

Implementation Method 1

uses mechanical linkage which increases the mechanical advantage or leverage applied to the cutters to cut plastic cylinder mold

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Advantage: Mechanical Advantage

Data Source

PatentUS10124501B2Concrete cylinder mold cutter
Publication Date: 2018.11.13 FRITZ ANDREW W
  • US10124501B2 patent drawing
  • US10124501B2 patent drawing
  • US10124501B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus for removing the plastic mold around cured concrete in a plastic test specimen includes a baseplate with upstanding framework that supports two spaced vertical rods to which a cross-member is slidably mounted to move up and down the rods. At least one blade member is carried by the cross-member such that upon descent it may cut away the plastic of the mold so the cured concrete test cylinder may be removed. The cross-member is driven up and down by a lever arm pivotally mounted to the framework and includes a linkage between the lever arm and cross-member to transfer energy downward from the lever arm to cut and strip away the plastic mold from the concrete.