Additive Concrete Printing Speed and Strength Coordination

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current generative manufacturing processes for producing concrete moldings are limited by the physical and chemical properties of concrete mixtures, leading to slow production speeds due to kinetics and thixotropic properties, which result in reduced quality and increased complexity.

Innovation Solution

A method for producing shaped bodies from mineral binder compositions using a print head that applies curable material in layers, coordinating application rate and temporal strength development, adjusting movement speed based on strength development, and potentially using hardening accelerators to optimize production efficiency and quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If concrete mixture is applied layer by layer using conventional additive manufacturing processes, then molded bodies can be produced, but production speed is severely limited due to kinetics and thixotropic properties

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction speedVSAvoidquality and strength of molded bodies
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical parameters of the concrete mixture by adding specific additives that modify the kinetics of the cement hydration reaction. These additives accelerate the strength development without compromising the thixotropic properties, allowing faster layer application while maintaining quality and strength requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces chemical intermediaries (additives) that mediate between the cement and water interaction. These intermediaries control the reaction rate and strengthen development, enabling the system to achieve both high productivity and reliable quality by optimizing the chemical interaction dynamics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If application rate of curable material is increased to improve production speed, then productivity increases, but adhesion between layers may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction speedVSAvoidadhesion between layers
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the rheological and chemical parameters of the curable material through additive incorporation. This changes the material's strength development kinetics and thixotropic behavior, allowing faster application rates while maintaining sufficient adhesion between layers through optimized chemical reaction characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent makes the material properties dynamic by controlling the time-dependent strength development through chemical additives. The material transitions from a state suitable for rapid application to a state providing sufficient adhesion, with the transition timing controlled by the chemical composition and reaction kinetics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If waiting time between layers is increased to ensure strength development, then quality improves, but production time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality and strength of molded bodiesVSAvoidproduction time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the temporal parameters of strength development by introducing chemical additives that accelerate the cement hydration reaction. This modifies the time course of strength acquisition, allowing reduced waiting times between layers while still achieving the necessary quality and strength, thereby reducing overall production time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary chemical preparation by incorporating strength-enhancing additives into the mixture before application. This preliminary action ensures that the material has optimized strength development characteristics from the start, reducing the need for extended waiting periods and accelerating the overall production process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method enables efficient, reliable, and rapid production of high-quality moldings by synchronizing application rate with strength development, reducing waiting times, and maintaining adhesion between layers, thus overcoming the limitations of conventional systems.

Implementation Method 1

The binder liquid is polymerized due to an activator incorporated into the particles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPolymerization: Photopolymerisation

Implementation Method 2

the curable material is applied layer by layer in a generative free-space process... coordinating application rate and temporal strength development

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCuring: Chemical Bonding

Data Source

PatentEP3865280B1Generative production of moulded articles made from hardenable materials
Publication Date: 2024.08.14 SIKA TECH AG
  • EP3865280B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3865280B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present invention relates to a method for producing a molded body from a curable material, in particular from a mineral binder composition, wherein the curable material is applied layer by layer in an additive process, in particular in an additive free-space process, by means of a print head movable in at least one spatial direction, and wherein an application rate of the curable material and the strength development over time of the curable material are coordinated.