Concrete Element Surface Finish via Pre-Compaction Granular Embedding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for producing concrete elements with a surface resembling natural stone struggle with adhesion of granular materials, wear resistance, and require additional sealing steps, increasing manufacturing costs and complexity.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a concrete layer with a water-binder value of 0.31 to 0.45 and a granular material composition of 75-85% litter component and 15-25% binder, applied before compaction, to achieve enhanced mechanical properties and eliminate the need for post-production sealing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Shape

If granular material is applied to the concrete surface after production, then the surface appearance can be improved, but additional sealing steps are required which increase manufacturing costs and complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface appearanceVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The granular material is applied to the concrete layer before compaction instead of after production. This preliminary action allows the granular material to be integrated into the concrete matrix during the compaction process, eliminating the need for subsequent sealing steps and reducing manufacturing complexity while achieving the desired surface appearance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The application of granular material and the compaction process are merged into a single operational step. The granular material is applied to the concrete layer and then compacted together in one process sequence, integrating what were previously separate operations (surface treatment and sealing) into a unified manufacturing step

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Shape

If granular material is applied to the concrete surface, then aesthetic appeal is improved, but adhesion and wear resistance become problematic

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface appearanceVSAvoidadhesion and wear resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The granular material is applied before the concrete is compacted and while the concrete is still in its plastic state. This timing ensures that the granular material becomes mechanically interlocked with the concrete matrix during compaction, creating strong adhesion and improving wear resistance rather than merely surface-level attachment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The concrete layer and granular material form a composite structure where the granular material is embedded within the concrete matrix. This composite approach enhances both the aesthetic appearance and the mechanical properties including adhesion and wear resistance, as the granular material becomes an integral part of the concrete structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Ease of operation

If water-binder ratio is increased to improve workability, then concrete is easier to process, but compressive strength decreases due to increased porosity

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveworkabilityVSAvoidcompressive strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The water-binder ratio is precisely controlled within the range of 0.30-0.40, representing an optimization of this critical parameter. This specific range provides the optimal balance between workability and compressive strength, avoiding both the poor workability of very low ratios and the excessive porosity and reduced strength of high ratios

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The concrete mixture is designed with specific local characteristics in terms of water-binder distribution and granular material composition. The granular material itself has controlled water-binder ratio (0.24-0.38) that differs from the base concrete (0.30-0.40), creating local quality variations that optimize both workability during application and final compressive strength after compaction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method produces concrete elements with improved compressive strength, abrasion resistance, and aesthetic appeal, eliminating the need for post-production sealing and reducing manufacturing costs while achieving a surface similar to natural stone.

Implementation Method 1

at least one portion of a granular material is applied to the concrete layer prior to compaction by means of an application device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Force: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 2

the concrete is compacted by vibration and/or stamping

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration: Vibration

Data Source

PatentEP3166904B1Method for producing concrete elements
Publication Date: 2024.03.20 METTEN TECH GMBH & CO KG
  • EP3166904B1 patent drawingFigure 1

AI summary

Presented and described is a method for manufacturing concrete elements having at least one concrete layer, wherein concrete for at least one element is introduced into a mould, the concrete is compacted by vibration and/or by tamping and subsequently cures, there being applied to the concrete layer, prior to compaction, at least one portion of a particulate material by means of an application device, where the concrete introduced into the mould prior to curing has a water/binder (w/b) ratio of 0.30 to 0.50 and said particulate material used is a material comprising (a) a scatter component having an average particle diameter of 0.1 to 5 mm in an amount of 65 to 95 wt% and (b) binder in an amount of 5 to 35 wt%, based in each case on the overall composition of the particulate material.