Concrete Wall Reinforcement Using Carbon Fiber Mesh and Epoxy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Concrete block walls are susceptible to cracking and bowing due to lateral loads and water pressure, with existing repair methods failing to prevent further damage and structural collapse.

Innovation Solution

A reinforcing assembly comprising a rigid sheet and brackets with perpendicular legs, where the brackets are anchored into the wall and the sheet is adhered using epoxy resin, providing mechanical reinforcement and tensile strength to counteract bowing and cracking.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If carbon fibers are bonded to the wall to fix cracks, then tensile strength is improved, but the concrete may be pulled loose from the wall

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetensile strengthVSAvoidbond integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by using a mesh structure with epoxy resin that selectively reinforces crack locations while maintaining concrete integrity. The mesh is positioned and bonded specifically at crack locations, providing localized tensile strength enhancement without distributing force uniformly across the entire wall surface, thus preventing concrete from being pulled loose.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite materials by combining carbon fibers with epoxy resin in a mesh structure. This composite approach creates a reinforced material that maintains bond integrity through the epoxy matrix while providing tensile strength through the carbon fiber reinforcement, resolving the contradiction between strength improvement and bond reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If epoxy resin is used to bond carbon fibers to the wall, then tensile strength is improved, but the epoxy may not fully encompass the fibers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetensile strengthVSAvoidbond coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a flexible mesh structure where the epoxy resin is applied to bond carbon fiber elements together and to the wall. The mesh configuration allows the epoxy to fully encompass each fiber element while maintaining proper bond coverage, as the flexible mesh structure distributes the bonding requirements across multiple attachment points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the reinforcement system into discrete carbon fiber elements arranged in a mesh pattern. This segmentation allows epoxy resin to be applied to bond each element individually, ensuring complete coverage of all fibers while maintaining precise bond coverage through the modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Object-affected harmful factors

If traditional crack repair methods are used, then water ingress is reduced, but the walls continue to crack and bow

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewater ingressVSAvoidstructural stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary anti-action by installing the carbon fiber mesh reinforcement before water ingress can cause further damage. The mesh is bonded to the wall and anchored to the foundation, creating a preemptive reinforcement structure that counteracts the forces causing cracks and bowing, thereby preventing further structural degradation while also addressing water ingress issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite materials (carbon fibers with epoxy resin) to create a reinforcement system that simultaneously addresses both water ingress prevention and structural stability. The composite mesh structure provides tensile strength to prevent cracking while the epoxy bonding creates a waterproof barrier, resolving the contradiction between reducing water ingress and maintaining structural stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively strengthens concrete walls by enhancing their tensile strength and preventing further cracking and bowing, thereby improving structural integrity and preventing water ingress.

Implementation Method 1

The rigid sheet is adapted to be adhered to the structure. The second leg adheres to the rigid sheet.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesive bonding: Adhesive

Data Source

PatentUS7743585B2Structure reinforcement system
Publication Date: 2010.06.29 WHEATLEY DONALD E
  • US7743585B2 patent drawing
  • US7743585B2 patent drawing
  • US7743585B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An assembly for reinforcing a structure is provided. The assembly generally includes a rigid sheet and a bracket. The rigid sheet is adapted to be adhered to the structure. The bracket includes a first leg and a second leg. The first leg is adapted to penetratingly engage the structure. The second leg adheres to the rigid sheet. The first and second legs extend substantially perpendicular to each other.