Concurrent Gradient Descent for Financial Plan Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional financial planning tools are inefficient in generating optimal financial plans due to computational resource-intensive methods, inaccurate modeling of personal factors, and failure to update plans in real-time, leading to suboptimal decisions and outdated financial strategies.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented system and method for modeling future asset value using concurrent gradient descent, which establishes planning simulation and optimization parameters, executes parallel gradient descent to determine optimal financial plans, and reports them, incorporating real-time market and personal data for dynamic financial planning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If brute force computing is used to calculate every possibility of results for plans, then comprehensive coverage of all possibilities is achieved, but significant computing resources and time are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomprehensive coverage of possibilitiesVSAvoidcomputing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the computation process into two distinct phases: (1) a brute force phase that comprehensively evaluates all possible plans to identify candidate plans with high success probabilities, and (2) a concurrent gradient descent phase that efficiently optimizes among these candidates to determine the optimal plan. This segmentation allows the system to maintain comprehensive coverage while reducing overall computing time and resources by applying different computational strategies to different stages of the problem.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary action by first using brute force computing to identify and filter candidate plans with the highest probabilities of success before applying the more efficient concurrent gradient descent optimization. This preliminary filtering step reduces the search space for subsequent optimization, allowing the system to achieve comprehensive coverage of possibilities while minimizing the computational resources required for the final optimization phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If conventional sequential optimization methods are used, then accuracy in determining optimal plans is maintained, but processing time becomes prohibitively long

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimization accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamics by transitioning from static sequential optimization to dynamic concurrent optimization. The concurrent gradient descent algorithm performs multiple optimization steps in parallel, allowing the system to explore multiple solution paths simultaneously and converge to the optimal plan more quickly. This dynamic approach maintains optimization accuracy while dramatically reducing processing time compared to conventional sequential methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the computational parameter from sequential processing to concurrent parallel processing. By executing multiple gradient descent steps concurrently rather than sequentially, the system achieves the same optimization accuracy with significantly reduced processing time. This parameter change transforms the computational approach while maintaining the mathematical rigor needed for accurate optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If financial plans are generated based on multiple variables such as lifestyle, age, income, retirement date, and lifespan, then personalized accuracy is improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonalization accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex multi-variable optimization problem into manageable phases: first using brute force to evaluate all combinations of personal variables (lifestyle, age, income, retirement date, lifespan) to identify candidate plans, then using concurrent gradient descent to optimize among these candidates. This segmentation handles computational complexity by applying different algorithms to different aspects of the problem while maintaining personalized accuracy through comprehensive evaluation of all variable combinations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary action by first comprehensively evaluating all combinations of personal variables to identify candidate plans with high success probabilities before applying optimization. This preliminary phase handles the computational complexity of multiple personal variables by systematically evaluating them all, then reduces the complexity for the final optimization step by working only with the identified candidate plans rather than all possible combinations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11334947B1Systems and methods for modeling future value
Publication Date: 2022.05.17 CAPITAL ONE INVESTING INC
  • US11334947B1 patent drawing
  • US11334947B1 patent drawing
  • US11334947B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments provide systems and methods for modeling future asset value, which may establish planning simulation and optimization parameters for an individual, execute a planning simulation based on the parameters, analyze results of the planning simulation to determine candidate plans with highest chances of success, determine, from among the candidate plans, an optimal plan, based on executing concurrent gradient descent that includes executing steps of gradient descent in parallel, and report the optimal plan. Embodiments may also provide systems and methods for describing a portfolio and investment goals in a manner comprehensible by the investor, modeling financial plans that meet those goals, simulating those plans over time, selecting the plans that demonstrate the greatest utility for the investor, executing those plans in the market, and continually revising plans as circumstances change.