Condensate-Cooled Refrigerant Loop for Compressed Gas Drying

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Compressor systems face inefficiencies due to moisture in compressed gas, which can damage downstream components and affect operation, as existing moisture removal methods do not completely eliminate moisture, leaving the gas partially humid.

Innovation Solution

A gas compression system incorporating a refrigeration cycle with a condenser, evaporator, expansion device, and a recuperator, where condensate from the compressed gas is used to cool the refrigerant, reducing the load on the condenser and improving efficiency by pre-cooling the refrigerant and further drying the compressed gas.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a refrigeration system is used to remove moisture from compressed gas, then the moisture removal effectiveness is improved, but the energy consumption increases due to the condenser load

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemoisture removal effectivenessVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary cooling of the refrigerant using condensate from the compressed gas before the refrigerant enters the condenser. This pre-cooling action reduces the temperature differential required in the condenser, thereby reducing the condenser load and energy consumption while maintaining effective moisture removal capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system converts the waste thermal energy in the condensate (which would normally be discarded) into a useful resource by using it to pre-cool the refrigerant. This transforms a harmful waste product into a beneficial cooling source, reducing the overall energy consumption of the refrigeration system while maintaining moisture removal effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

2Ease of manufacture

If the condenser size is reduced to lower costs, then the system cost decreases, but the cooling capacity is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem costVSAvoidcooling capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

By pre-cooling the refrigerant with condensate before it enters the condenser, the system reduces the cooling burden on the condenser. This allows a smaller condenser to achieve the same effective cooling capacity, thereby reducing system cost while maintaining adequate cooling performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses its own condensate (a byproduct of the refrigeration process) to pre-cool the refrigerant, creating a self-service mechanism that enhances cooling capacity without requiring additional external cooling resources or increasing condenser size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Use of energy by moving object

If the refrigerant is pre-cooled to improve efficiency, then the energy efficiency increases, but additional cooling equipment is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy efficiencyVSAvoidequipment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The heat exchanger serves multiple functions: it acts as both a condenser for the refrigerant and a pre-cooler using condensate. This multi-functionality allows the system to achieve refrigerant pre-cooling without requiring separate dedicated equipment, thereby improving energy efficiency while minimizing increases in device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges the condensation process with the refrigerant pre-cooling process in a single integrated heat exchanger unit. By combining these two functions into one component, the system achieves pre-cooling capability without adding separate equipment, thus improving energy efficiency while keeping the equipment structure relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively reduces the dew point of compressed gas, enhances the efficiency of the refrigeration and compression processes, and allows for a smaller, less energy-intensive condenser, thereby improving overall system performance and reducing costs.

Implementation Method 1

an evaporator positioned to receive the flow of compressed refrigerant and the flow of compressed gas and arranged to cool the compressed gas

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 2

A heat exchanger is positioned to receive the flow of compressed refrigerant and the flow of condensate and is arranged to cool the flow of refrigerant with the flow of condensate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 3

The heat exchanger and the condenser cooperate to cool the flow of compressed refrigerant to a desired temperature

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Convection

Data Source

PatentUS8006503B2Energy recovery system and method for a refrigerated dehumidification process
Publication Date: 2011.08.30 INGERSOLL RAND IND US INC
  • US8006503B2 patent drawing
  • US8006503B2 patent drawing
  • US8006503B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A gas compression system includes a flow of compressed gas, a separator positioned to receive the flow of compressed gas and discharge a second flow of compressed gas and a flow of condensate, and a flow of compressed refrigerant. A heat exchanger is positioned to receive the flow of condensate and the flow of compressed refrigerant. The heat exchanger is arranged such that the flow of condensate cools the flow of refrigerant.