Condensate Trap Vent Chamber Layout for Pressure Equalization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Heating-cooling systems face issues with condensation formation, which can lead to malfunction or damage due to inadequate condensate removal, particularly exacerbated by increased furnace vent lengths and large internal volumes in condensate traps, reducing installation flexibility and affecting pressure management.

Innovation Solution

A condensation trap design featuring an inlet chamber, vent chamber, and outlet chamber with a larger internal vent volume than the inlet chamber, facilitating compact size and efficient condensate drainage, along with a manufacturing method using a mold and injection molding process to produce the trap.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Length of moving object

If the furnace vent length is increased, then the condensate trap must operate under larger atmospheric pressure changes, but this reduces installation flexibility and increases minimum trap size

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefurnace vent lengthVSAvoidinstallation flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The trap is divided into distinct chambers (inlet chamber, vent chamber, outlet chamber) with specific functions, allowing each segment to be optimized for its purpose while maintaining overall compactness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the volume parameter relationship, making the vent chamber volume greater than the inlet chamber volume, which optimizes pressure equalization while maintaining compact dimensions for flexible installation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If the condensate trap has large internal volume to handle pressure changes, then it can manage atmospheric pressure variations, but this increases the minimum size and reduces installation flexibility

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure management capabilityVSAvoidinstallation flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the volume parameters by making the vent chamber volume greater than the inlet chamber volume, achieving effective pressure management while minimizing overall trap size for flexible installation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent arranges chambers in a compact three-dimensional configuration with vertical and horizontal passageways, achieving sufficient internal volume for pressure management within a small external footprint

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Adaptability or versatility

If the condensate trap is designed with compact size for flexible installation, then installation flexibility is improved, but this may reduce the volume available for pressure equalization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation flexibilityVSAvoidpressure equalization capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses efficient three-dimensional chamber arrangement and vertical passageways to maximize internal volume within compact external dimensions, maintaining pressure equalization capability while achieving flexible installation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes the volume ratio between vent chamber and inlet chamber, ensuring sufficient pressure equalization volume is allocated to the vent chamber while keeping overall dimensions compact

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design allows for effective condensate management without losing prime under varying pressures, enabling a compact and flexible installation that maintains system performance and prevents damage from condensation.

Implementation Method 1

One technical feature of the trap is an internal vent volume portion that is larger than an inlet chamber internal volume. This feature facilitates the trap's ability to accommodate certain inlet pressures without causing the trap to lose its prime

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure equalization: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

The inlet chamber, vent chamber, and outlet chamber facilitate compact size and efficient condensate drainage

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity drainage: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentUS9170029B2Condensate trap for heating-cooling systems
Publication Date: 2015.10.27 LENNOX IND INC
  • US9170029B2 patent drawing
  • US9170029B2 patent drawing
  • US9170029B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A condensation trap comprising an inlet chamber, a vent chamber and an outlet chamber. The inlet chamber is configured to receive condensate fluid through an external opening therein. The vent chamber is in fluid communication with the inlet chamber via a first passageway that includes an internal opening of the inlet chamber. The internal opening is located substantially at an opposite end of the vent chamber as the external opening. The outlet chamber is in fluid communication with the vent chamber via a second passageway that includes an internal opening in a sidewall of the vent chamber and an interior opening in an end of the outlet chamber. The outlet chamber is configured to transmit the condensate fluid through an exterior opening located at an opposite end of the outlet chamber. A vent volume portion is greater than a total volume of an internal space of the inlet chamber.