Conditional Cell Switching for Low-Latency Successive Handover

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing 5G and 6G wireless communication systems face challenges in managing fast mobility scenarios, particularly in non-terrestrial networks and terrestrial networks with high-speed user equipment, due to signaling overhead and delay during successive cell switches, which affect handover reliability and latency.

Innovation Solution

A user equipment (UE) is configured with cell switch configurations for multiple candidate cells, including conditional events such as beam, location, and time events, allowing autonomous cell switching based on predefined criteria without continuous network intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If network-controlled mobility with conditional handover is used, then connection quality is maintained, but signaling overhead and latency increase during successive cell switches

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection qualityVSAvoidhandover latency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The UE autonomously evaluates trigger conditions and executes cell switching without continuous network intervention. The UE monitors measurement quantities, compares them against threshold values, and independently decides when to switch cells, eliminating the need for network-controlled handover procedures that introduce latency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The network pre-configures multiple candidate cells with their associated trigger conditions and measurement criteria before the UE needs to switch. This preparation allows the UE to immediately execute cell switching when conditions are met, without waiting for network instructions, thereby reducing handover latency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If successive cell switches are performed in fast mobility scenarios, then mobility tracking is maintained, but signaling overhead increases and handover reliability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemobility trackingVSAvoidhandover reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The UE independently monitors and evaluates trigger conditions for multiple candidate cells simultaneously. When a cell becomes the active serving cell, the UE continues to monitor other candidate cells and can autonomously switch to them if their trigger conditions are met, ensuring reliable mobility tracking without excessive signaling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The UE continuously monitors measurement quantities of candidate cells and maintains readiness to switch cells as needed. This continuous monitoring without interruption ensures that mobility tracking remains accurate and reliable, even during fast movement scenarios, while avoiding the signaling overhead of repeated network instructions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Loss of time

If L1/L2 triggered mobility is used, then mobility latency is reduced, but signaling overhead cannot be sufficiently decreased for successive switches

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemobility latencyVSAvoidsignaling overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The UE autonomously evaluates L1 measurement conditions and trigger criteria without requiring continuous L1/L2 signaling from the network. The UE independently determines when cell switching is needed based on pre-configured conditions, significantly reducing signaling overhead while maintaining low latency through local decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The network pre-provides trigger conditions and measurement criteria in higher layer signaling, allowing the UE to autonomously evaluate and execute cell switching based on L1 measurements without requiring continuous network instructions. This preparation reduces the signaling overhead associated with successive cell switches while maintaining fast response capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20260032529A1Successive conditional cell switch
Publication Date: 2026.01.29 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US20260032529A1 patent drawing
  • US20260032529A1 patent drawing
  • US20260032529A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a cell switch mechanism that enables successive conditional handover without configuration release or reconfiguration between cell switch executions. A UE receives from a source base station a cell switch configuration for a plurality of candidate cells. The cell switch configuration includes conditional events associated with a respective one of the plurality of candidate cells. The UE determines whether the conditional events associated with at least one cell from the plurality of candidate cells are fulfilled when the UE is connected to the source base station. The UE triggers a cell switch to connect to a first target cell from the plurality of candidate cells when the conditional events associated with the first target cell are fulfilled. The UE determines whether to switch from the first target cell to a second target cell from the plurality of candidate cells based on the cell switch configuration for the candidate cells.