Conditional F1AP NGAP Event Reporting for Timing Resilience

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In next-generation radio access network architecture, there is no effective method to ensure that a central unit of a gNB is aware of the timing synchronization status at a distributed unit to determine if the service is acceptable or unacceptable for user equipment, leading to unnecessary large volumes of reports and failure to capture user equipment's clock quality acceptance criteria.

Innovation Solution

Implementing conditional event reporting by determining a radio access network timing synchronization status reporting range associated with attributes and transmitting this range to a second network node, allowing for targeted reporting based on pre-configured thresholds and user equipment-specific acceptance criteria, thereby reducing unnecessary reports and ensuring timely updates to the central unit.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If event-triggered reporting is configured upon significant events, then timing synchronization status can be monitored and reported, but the volume of reports increases unnecessarily when status remains within acceptable ranges

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetiming synchronization status monitoringVSAvoidvolume of reports
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a reporting range parameter that modifies the threshold behavior. Instead of reporting only when status exceeds a fixed threshold, the system reports when the status changes by an amount greater than a configured reporting range. This parameter change allows the system to filter out unnecessary reports while maintaining reliable monitoring of significant timing synchronization status changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of information

If continuous periodic reporting is configured, then timing synchronization status is always updated, but network resources are consumed unnecessarily when status is stable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetiming synchronization status updatesVSAvoidnetwork resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic reporting behavior where the system adapts its reporting frequency based on the current status conditions. The reporting mechanism transitions from static continuous periodic reporting to dynamic conditional reporting that activates only when the timing synchronization status changes by an amount exceeding the reporting range. This dynamic approach ensures information is updated when needed while conserving network resources during stable periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of manufacture

If traditional threshold-based reporting is used, then simple implementation is maintained, but user equipment-specific acceptance criteria cannot be captured

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation simplicityVSAvoiduser equipment-specific acceptance criteria
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the reporting threshold into two components: a base threshold for detecting status changes and a reporting range parameter that can be configured differently for different user equipment. This segmentation allows the system to maintain the simplicity of threshold-based reporting while adding flexibility to accommodate user equipment-specific acceptance criteria through the reporting range configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20240414665A1Method for f1ap and ngap conditional event reporting for timing resilience
Publication Date: 2024.12.12 NOKIA TECHNOLOGIES OY
  • US20240414665A1 patent drawing
  • US20240414665A1 patent drawing
  • US20240414665A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A network node, a core network node and a user equipment are disclosed. The network and the core network node each includes a processor; and a memory storing respective instructions. When executed by the processor, the network node is configured to: determine at least one radio access network timing synchronization status reporting range associated with at least one radio access network timing synchronization status attribute; and transmit, to a second network node, the radio access network timing synchronization status reporting range. The core network node is configured to: determine at least one radio access network timing synchronization status reporting range associated with at least one radio access network timing synchronization status attribute. In addition, the user equipment includes a processor; and a memory storing instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the user equipment to: determine a clock quality acceptance criteria; and transmit the clock quality acceptance criteria.