Conditional Handover Using Future QoS Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing radio communication systems face challenges in accurately predicting handover events due to stochastic channel models, leading to service interruptions and management overhead, particularly in resource-constrained scenarios.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a method for conditional handover that includes determining future QoS using machine-trained models and pre-trigger indications to manage handovers proactively, reducing unnecessary handover actions and optimizing resource usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If periodic monitoring of the channel is performed to assess channel quality, then channel quality assessment accuracy is improved, but service interruptions and management overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel quality assessment accuracyVSAvoidservice continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by predicting future QoS values before actual handover is needed. Machine learning models forecast channel quality at future time instants, allowing the network to proactively identify deteriorating channels and initiate handover preparations in advance, thus avoiding service interruptions while maintaining accurate channel assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where predicted QoS values are continuously fed back into the handover decision-making process. The network monitors predicted channel quality and adjusts handover timing and resource allocation based on these predictions, creating a closed-loop system that improves service continuity while optimizing monitoring efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If handover conditions are evaluated based on current QoS only, then decision simplicity is improved, but handover timing accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandover decision simplicityVSAvoidhandover timing accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary QoS predictions for future time instants before handover execution is required. By forecasting channel quality ahead of time, the network can make more accurate handover timing decisions while maintaining the simplicity of rule-based evaluation logic. The machine learning models handle the complex prediction work, leaving the decision logic relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces dynamic elements by evaluating QoS at multiple future time instants rather than a single static point. This allows the handover decision to adapt to predicted channel variations over time, improving timing accuracy while the underlying evaluation mechanism remains based on straightforward comparisons of predicted QoS values against handover thresholds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If multiple candidate cells are prepared for handover to increase robustness, then handover reliability is improved, but resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandover robustnessVSAvoidresource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary assessment of multiple candidate cells by predicting their future QoS values. Instead of preparing all possible candidate cells, the network uses predicted QoS to identify and prioritize the most promising candidates, preparing resources only for cells likely to become optimal. This reduces resource consumption while maintaining robustness through selective multi-cell preparation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes the set of active candidate cells based on predicted QoS parameters. As channel conditions evolve, the network adjusts which cells remain in the candidate list, adding or removing cells based on future QoS predictions. This parameter-driven approach maintains handover robustness with multiple candidates while optimizing resource usage by keeping only the most relevant candidates active.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12621736B2Methods and apparatuses for radio communication
Publication Date: 2026.05.05 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US12621736B2 patent drawing
  • US12621736B2 patent drawing
  • US12621736B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for radio communication. The method includes: receiving at least one conditional handover execution condition for conducting a conditional handover; determining at least one future QoS that characterizes a quality of at least one radio channel between a radio terminal and a radio access node for at least one future time instant; and evaluating the at least one handover condition based at least on the at least one future QoS.