Conditional Mobility Execution Control in 5G Networks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems for controlling conditional mobility procedures in multi-connectivity scenarios, particularly in 5G NR and E-UTRA networks, face challenges in efficiently managing sequential execution of mobility procedures due to dependencies between configurations and limitations in handling delta and full configurations, leading to potential handover failures and interruptions.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus and method for controlling the sequential execution of conditional mobility procedures, allowing for the simultaneous evaluation and execution of CHO and CPC commands based on specific configuration dependencies, with mechanisms to handle delta and full configurations, and ensuring compatibility with UE capabilities, thereby enabling coexistence and reliable handover operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conditional mobility procedures are executed simultaneously, then handover efficiency is improved, but configuration conflicts and execution failures occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandover efficiencyVSAvoidconfiguration consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a preliminary evaluation phase where the UE assesses whether simultaneous execution of conditional mobility procedures is feasible before actually executing them. The UE evaluates configuration dependencies and determines a safe execution order, preventing conflicts before they occur. This preliminary action enables efficient parallel processing when safe, while avoiding execution failures when conflicts exist.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If sequential execution control is implemented, then configuration conflicts are avoided, but handover execution time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration consistencyVSAvoidhandover execution time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic execution control mechanism where the UE continuously monitors configuration dependencies and adjusts the execution strategy in real-time. When configurations are independent, the UE executes procedures in parallel to minimize time loss. When dependencies are detected, the UE dynamically switches to sequential execution to maintain configuration consistency. This dynamic adaptation optimizes both reliability and execution time based on actual system state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If dependency checking is performed between configurations, then execution correctness is improved, but processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexecution correctnessVSAvoidcontrol mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables the UE to autonomously perform dependency checking and execution order determination without requiring complex external control mechanisms. The UE independently evaluates configuration dependencies, determines safe execution sequences, and controls the mobility procedures themselves. This self-service approach improves execution correctness while avoiding the added complexity of external control systems, as the UE leverages its existing processing capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20230379771A1Controlling execution of conditional mobility procedures in wireless communication
Publication Date: 2023.11.23 NOKIA TECHNOLOGIES OY
  • US20230379771A1 patent drawing
  • US20230379771A1 patent drawing
  • US20230379771A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus comprising means for controlling execution of a plurality of conditional mobility procedures, the conditional mobility procedures comprising a first conditional mobility procedure comprising a first configuration initiated by a first network node, and a second conditional mobility procedure comprising a second configuration initiated by a second network node, wherein controlling execution of the plurality of conditional mobility procedures comprises controlling sequential execution of the first and second conditional mobility procedures based on the first configuration and the second configuration.