Conditional Normalizing Flow for Posterior Collapse in CVAE

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conditional variational autoencoders (CVAEs) face issues with over-regularization, difficulty in capturing multi-modal distributions, and latent variable collapse, leading to unimodal predictions and poor learning of probability distributions, particularly in uncertain environments like real-world traffic scenarios.

Innovation Solution

A machine learnable system with conditional normalizing flow based priors is introduced, allowing for flexible modeling of conditional probability distributions, which helps alleviate the posterior collapse problem by using a variational autoencoder with a flexible conditional prior, enabling the system to capture complex distributions and predict less likely events effectively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a standard Gaussian prior is used in CVAE, then the model structure is simple, but the model suffers from posterior collapse and cannot capture multi-modal distributions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel structureVSAvoidprediction reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the prior distribution parameter from a standard Gaussian to a flexible conditional prior that can adapt to different data characteristics. This allows the model to capture multi-modal distributions while maintaining a relatively simple architectural structure, resolving the contradiction between structural simplicity and prediction reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a dynamic conditional prior that can adapt its parameters based on the input condition. This dynamic adjustment enables the model to handle varying data distributions and avoid posterior collapse, improving prediction reliability without significantly increasing structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If CVAE is used for prediction, then the model can handle uncertainty, but the model produces unimodal predictions and fails to capture less likely events

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuncertainty handlingVSAvoidprediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

By changing the prior distribution to a flexible conditional prior, the model can represent multi-modal distributions that capture both likely and less likely events. This parameter change enables the model to maintain uncertainty handling capability while improving prediction accuracy for rare events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extends the prediction space by introducing additional dimensions through the flexible prior, allowing the model to represent multiple possible outcomes simultaneously. This dimensional extension enables capturing of less likely events while maintaining the ability to handle uncertainty.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If conditional normalizing flow based priors are used, then the model can capture complex distributions, but the model complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedistribution learning capabilityVSAvoidmodel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex prior distribution into conditional components that can be learned separately. This segmentation allows the model to capture complex distributions through modular building blocks, reducing overall model complexity while maintaining distribution learning capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces conditional normalizing flow as an intermediary transformation that maps between simple and complex distributions. This intermediary structure enables the model to learn complex distributions without directly parameterizing them, thereby reducing model complexity while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP3767541A1A machine learnable system with conditional normalizing flow
Publication Date: 2021.01.20 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • EP3767541A1 patent drawingFigure 1a~1b
  • EP3767541A1 patent drawingFigure 1c~1d
  • EP3767541A1 patent drawingFigure 2~3

AI summary

Some embodiments are directed to a machine learnable system (110). A conditional normalizing flow function maps a latent representation (z) to a base point (e=f(z,c)) in a base space (E) conditional on conditioning data (c). The conditional normalizing flow function is a machine learnable function and trained on a set of training pairs.