Conditional Tasks in Graphics Pipeline for Incremental Rendering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In graphics processing systems, incremental rendering requires loading a previous frame into the pipeline for incremental geometry to be applied, which is inefficient and resource-intensive, especially in tile-based systems where each tile must be pre-loaded, leading to unnecessary data loading and memory usage challenges.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a method where conditional tasks are executed in the graphics processing pipeline based on specific conditions, allowing only necessary data to be loaded and processed for each tile, using conditional tasks that load depth and color values only when intersecting geometry is present and passes early culling tests, optimizing the rendering process by reducing unnecessary data loading.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the previous frame is loaded into the graphics processing pipeline for incremental rendering, then the incremental geometry can be rendered on top of the existing frame, but unnecessary data loading and memory usage increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveincremental rendering correctnessVSAvoidmemory usage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary culling tests on incremental geometry before loading frame data, determining in advance whether loading is necessary. This preliminary action avoids unnecessary data loading by pre-evaluating whether the incremental geometry actually intersects with the tile region, thus resolving the contradiction between ensuring rendering correctness and reducing memory usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system extracts and applies only the necessary portions of the previous frame data (depth and color values) only when incremental geometry actually intersects with the tile, rather than loading entire frames. This selective extraction approach maintains rendering correctness while significantly reducing memory usage by loading only what is needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Reliability

If the previous frame is loaded into the graphics processing pipeline for incremental rendering, then the incremental geometry can be rendered on top of the existing frame, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveincremental rendering correctnessVSAvoidrendering time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary culling tests to determine whether incremental geometry intersects with tile regions before initiating data loading and processing. This preliminary evaluation prevents unnecessary processing steps, reducing rendering time while ensuring that required processing is not missed, thus resolving the contradiction between rendering correctness and processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs only the necessary partial action of loading and processing frame data for tiles that actually contain intersecting incremental geometry, rather than processing all tiles. This selective partial processing reduces overall processing time while maintaining correctness for all relevant regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Ease of operation

If all tiles are pre-loaded with base frame content, then incremental rendering can be performed, but data loading efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveincremental rendering operationVSAvoiddata loading efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary culling tests to identify which tiles require base frame content loading before incremental rendering. This preliminary identification enables selective loading of only necessary tiles, improving data loading efficiency while maintaining the ease of incremental rendering operation for required regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the rendering process into two phases: first performing culling tests to identify relevant tiles, then loading and processing only those segments. This segmentation approach improves data loading efficiency by avoiding unnecessary loading of entire frames while preserving the operational simplicity of incremental rendering for the identified regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10013790B2Executing conditional tasks in a graphics processing pipeline
Publication Date: 2018.07.03 ARM LTD
  • US10013790B2 patent drawing
  • US10013790B2 patent drawing
  • US10013790B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a graphics processing system, a driver for the graphics processing pipeline can include conditional graphics processing tasks in the graphics processing tasks that are to be executed by the graphics processing pipeline to generate a render output required by an application. Each such conditional task has associated with it a condition to be used by the graphics processing pipeline to determine whether to execute processing for the task or not and a region of the render output over which the processing for the task will be executed when the condition for the task is met. The graphics processing pipeline determines whether the condition associated with the task has been met, and only executes the processing for the task if the condition associated with the task has been met.